Joined: Feb 11 2008 Posts: 1087 Location: east of east hull
Mrs Barista wrote:Sadly for you, my love, I'm "still allowed access" because I don't tell lies and I don't do insults. Annoying for those unable to conduct a reasoned and fact-based argument that I can point out the things that many would prefer to gloss over, but essentially I'm a sort of public information service and as such will by definition be unpopular. The measure of my success is therefore threads like this. It's not the first and won't be the last.
how very tragic.
east hull fc fan wrote: 1 major trophy in 18 years doesn't make us a big club. On the pitch is were it counts and by that theory were no bigger than Sheffield! tarquin fuego wrote: I wrote this 2 mins before the game finished , you know why Sheldon Maylord ? because I know about RL ! Hoss pot HOW on earth do you get NILLED at Wembley ? When your coach isn't a winner at heart and Gentle is not a winner at heart . We were a pub team I coached for a long time and we won 95% of games because winning is a mental state driven by a desire to CRUSH an opposition. Did FC look as though they wanted to Crush Wigan and strangle them until they screamed ? NO RL is a tough tough game and Maylord She-dong you have no clue In fact don't ever ever reply to any of my posts again
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
Mrs Barista wrote: essentially I'm a sort of public information service and as such will by definition be unpopular.
I don't remember these chaps being all that unpopular.
This is more your level of public service popularity.
EDIT: Hope nobody saw that, didn't realise until I checked the post that Tufty had been slightly adapted into a rude GIF. Sorry kids, all better now.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
pmh wrote:This is more your level of public service popularity.
EDIT: Hope nobody saw that, didn't realise until I checked the post that Tufty had been slightly adapted into a rude GIF. Sorry kids, all better now.
Fecking brilliant. The nit nurse. That's exactly what I am.
Now, make haste with the pinking shears, my feathered friend. David Mills won't create himself, at least not out of old Christmas cards, unless he's had a Paul Cooke moment of self-importance. I'm sure if he wanted to actually create himself Mild Rover's missus would put him right from a genetics perspective. Sorry for the split infinitive there, but doesn't sound right otherwise.
Mrs Barista wrote:Sadly for you, my love, I'm "still allowed access" because I don't tell lies and I don't do insults. Annoying for those unable to conduct a reasoned and fact-based argument that I can point out the things that many would prefer to gloss over, but essentially I'm a sort of public information service and as such will by definition be unpopular. The measure of my success is therefore threads like this. It's not the first and won't be the last.
Whilst it could be argued that your posts in isolation do not break the AUP, your outlook and method on this board is parasite-like in respect of the fact you choose to engineer posts/texts out of their original context.
This does not mean you are any cleverer than anyone else, it simply means that the rest of us are not bothered enough to waste our time and energy keeping and maintaining a database of quotes - this is simply not normal behaviour.
For example, at the time posting, as I look out my window I can see snow outside. It is quite plausible that you will list this in your database and bring it out next summer when it 's bright and sunny
Why don't you turn over a new leaf by deleting your database or can you not bear the thought of posting on these boards without your leech-like behaviour?
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
General Zod. wrote:Whilst it could be argued that your posts in isolation do not break the AUP, your outlook and method on this board is parasite-like in respect of the fact you choose to engineer posts/texts out of their original context.
This does not mean you are any cleverer than anyone else, it simply means that the rest of us are not bothered enough to waste our time and energy keeping and maintaining a database of quotes - this is simply not normal behaviour.
For example, at the time posting, as I look out my window I can see snow outside. It is quite plausible that you will list this in your database and bring it out next summer when it 's bright and sunny
Why don't you turn over a new leaf by deleting your database or can you not bear the thought of posting on these boards without your leech-like behaviour?
Look, you like to make shouty statements that some might construe as arrogant. As we have seen there are multiple examples of this, from predictions of players signing for Rovers, to slating O'Meley and Fitzgibbon before they arrived as 6 years past their best, to saying Rovers would finish 3rd and Hull FC 9th and following up with comments about people being insane to think FC could make the play-offs, to saying Mason would be here last week, to posting 150 times in 48 hours that Tom Briscoe is unathletic, immobile and slow, whilst Fox produces Offiah-like brilliance.
Why should you not be reminded of these somewhat nasty/cocky opinions and predictions when they're proved wrong? Are you saying we should just nod along and agree at new ones when your track record is patchy at best?
Mrs Barista wrote:Sadly for you, my love, I'm "still allowed access" because I don't tell lies and I don't do insults. Annoying for those unable to conduct a reasoned and fact-based argument that I can point out the things that many would prefer to gloss over, but essentially I'm a sort of public information service and as such will by definition be unpopular. The measure of my success is therefore threads like this. It's not the first and won't be the last.
By the tone of that reply and your recent vote on me it appears i am doing a sterling job.....my love
Standing up to the forum bully.
It must be working, he doesn't like me...i'm devastated
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Bertie wrote:By the tone of that reply and your recent vote on me it appears i am doing a sterling job.....my love
You are quite irritating. Particularly good at avoiding difficult and direct questions like how come Marc Herbert's here already having got his visa in less than 3 weeks, when you signed Mason 12 weeks ago.
Mrs Barista wrote:You are quite irritating. Particularly good at avoiding difficult and direct questions like how come Marc Herbert's here already having got his visa in less than 3 weeks, when you signed Mason 12 weeks ago.
Having no experience of how that agency works i have no idea TBH and do not like to comment on things i would only be guessing at....but i'm sure you will have no difficulty on this score
Standing up to the forum bully.
It must be working, he doesn't like me...i'm devastated
Joined: Sep 18 2005 Posts: 8742 Location: 2017 City of Culture
Mrs B, I don't find you irritating, more of a challenge. I only wish I had enough time to give you a run for your money sometimes, alas my life is too full to become a full time keyboard warrior!
My only (slight) critisism of you is your limited use of emoticons. There are more to chose from than , &
Try expanding your use, or occasionally not using them at all, most of of kinda get your mood without them!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
& 
