Really? It's that bad?

As you quite rightly say, it is down to people's opnions but to call it market feel is a bit excessive in my humble.

correct on all points.....
i dont know how long it will last but based on last years kit which was poorly designed with the splitting badges... and the feel of the even thinner material this year...and the way it looked on a member of staff in the club shop, I came to the conclusion it was a cheap rag and I wouldnt be paying over £40 quid for it.
Maybe its worth £20 but nothing more than that....

as I said in an earlier post its like the commemorative end of an era shirt, which I bought as a keep sake and not to wear although i did wear it to a couple of games.... and when the players played in that it didnt last 40 minutes did it? they had to change shirts at half time.

the club have seen an opportunity to make profit by selling substandard items at top whack...and i think its a bit off...

dont get me wrong I'm not starting a man united green and gold boycott the club merchandise thing.... instead of the shirt I bought a hoodie, and one for My son, and I got him wolfie slippers as well... I'm not being ripped off with that horrible shirt thats all.

On the main Wolves site there is a poll to see if youre buying the new shirts .....

Don't know how the figures are shaping up to last years.

I think the replica kit is not up to quality again, and i will look to the training range or possibly the players shirt for this seasons kit. The shorts and socks are nice

You honestly think the club made a conscious to decision to instruct their kit supplier to make (what you say) is a sub-standard product because they thought it would make more money? Not only is that harsh but there is not a single shred of evidence to support it.

The key thing for me is in spite of the collar, quality etc. is why do the two shirts have or need to have different designs.

Surely when samples were being looked at, someone would have pointed out that they don't look the same?

Shouldn't a "replica" shirt make you feel pride in your club?

What are the sizes like with the ISC shirts and stuff, is large a true large etc, or do they tend to be a bit on the big/small side compared to your average t-shirt or polo shirt????

If last year is anything to go by, they are a bit on the small size - well I hope thats the case!

no they almost certainly didnt instruct the manufacturer/supplier to make a sub standard kit...nor did i suggest they did anything of the sort...

its a fact though that this kit is not as good as the canterbury shirt yet it retails for more. now either the buyers have cocked up and the cost price was so high they have to charge £45 to make a reasonable profit.

or the cost price is the same or less than the Canterbury kits, and the product is of a poorer quality and the retail price is higher thereby profiting by charging top whack for a sub standard product.

I have no evidance of cost prices thats true but my allegation that a sub standard product in comparison to previous years is being flogged for top whack still stands....
had the reduction in quality been matched by a reduction in price i would be fine with that....

I walked past the new Wire kit in Asda today. It looks truly horrendous up close. Garish colours and just has a scruffy look to it, despite being brand new on the hanger.