keithcun wrote:The judge has amended the TRO so it reads, based "solely" on allegations, therefore on everything that Hicks has said. Hicks's lawyer would have prepared this lawsuit, the judge has read it and added solely (to cover his back I would imagine)
Secondly, the judge has crossed out "Taking any action in any other court to effect or impede this lawsuit".
I get the impression, a favour has been called, the judge has signed it but added his own caveats to protect himself, but as soon as the big wigs from RBS, Liverpool et al get to work, it will be soon overturned. I doubt the judge would have been aware of the court case yesterday, it wouldn't surprise me if Hicks or his lawyer forgot to mention it.
It wouldnt surprise me if Hicks hasnt traded on a fairly common view held by US lawyers that all other legal systems are inherently inferior to the US and that US citizens need protection from such systems. The idea of a Board selling a company without the permission of the owners is, on the face of it, irrational and if Hicks didnt mention or skirted over the issue of the governance letter the judge might not have taken too much convincing over the need for a TRO.
I agree that it seems likely that when the full facts are spelt out to the judge the TRO should be overturned. But you just wonder how many more tricks H&G have up their sleeves.
Joined: Aug 05 2002 Posts: 14094 Location: He can smoke a pound in a single bound!
Cibaman wrote:It wouldnt surprise me if Hicks hasnt traded on a fairly common view held by US lawyers that all other legal systems are inherently inferior to the US and that US citizens need protection from such systems. The idea of a Board selling a company without the permission of the owners is, on the face of it, irrational and if Hicks didnt mention or skirted over the issue of the governance letter the judge might not have taken too much convincing over the need for a TRO.
I agree that it seems likely that when the full facts are spelt out to the judge the TRO should be overturned. But you just wonder how many more tricks H&G have up their sleeves.
Might also have something to do with the politicised American justice system and Hicks owning the Texas Rangers in the past. Who knows what background deals have been done in the past?
If Mills have bought the shares, have they passed the fit and proper person test? Can they sell the shares without that being completed?
I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Quick scan of the table suggests you shouldn't be.
Errr, I don't think you should be pointing anybody in the direction of the league table
I am just baffled as to why we better watch out Sunday? Because of what went on in the court room we should now 'watch out' as your players have suddenly remembered how too play football
*****Warrington Wolves, 2009, 2010 & 2012 Challenge Cup Winners, 2011 League Leaders*****
Enfield Exile wrote: I am not a keyboard warrior: I am a n0b in real life.
Fresh Prince of Chesh-air wrote:Errr, I don't think you should be pointing anybody in the direction of the league table
I am just baffled as to why we better watch out Sunday? Because of what went on in the court room we should now 'watch out' as your players have suddenly remembered how too play football
Maybe you should ask the person instead of posting it on here trying to be funny.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
