http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... inary.html "Inconclusive evidence"

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... inary.html "Inconclusive evidence"

lets face it, if he'd bit Murrell he would need to go in quarantine for fear of catchin rabies

http://www.therfl.co.uk/~therflc/superl ... p?id=19000

http://www.therfl.co.uk/~therflc/superl ... p?id=19000

Put him in quarantine for 4 months for precaution anyway, not as if he's got anything else on is it.

Some extreme knee-jerkery there, Phillip.

Expect nothing less

We thought this - seemed strange he waited a couple of minutes before he decided to wail to Bentham. If you've been bit you know it immediately and make a fuss then.

Methinks he saw a mark afterwards and spotted a chance to make a bit of mischief... "Please sir, h-he b-bit me!! Oh loooook!".

At least, I'd like to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume it was something like this rather than a deliberate attempt to falsely accuse someone of one of the most gravely viewed offences in rugby. Either way, tough chedds Scotty.

Why is it?

He's got the mark on his arm, the DVD was inconclusive. Shaun is a very lucky boy unless the mark appeared on it's own?

looked to me like Vella took him to the ref, not Murrell going running to him.

Either that, because it suits your knee-jerk reaction, or he didn't bite him.