General Zod. wrote:WTF are you on about skinny ar5sed endless optimism? - all my posts indicate I think it will be a close win - .
I like your endless optimism, it's a good thing, I use it to offset my endless pessimism. And you are a skinny ar5e, there can be no complaint, everyone saw you missing kicks on the pitch at CP.
General Zod. wrote:[stop being a pr1ck.
I'll give it a go, not likely to succeed, sorry about that. Settle down little fella.
General Zod. wrote:As for our no risk style of play - FC's tactic will be five drives and a diagonal kick to the corner. If any team is gonna go wider of the ruck earlier in the tackle count it will be us.
We do have a low risk strategy, personally I think it's a good thing, on the odd occasion that we start wanging the ball about in our own twenty it more than often goes Pete Tong. A high percentage of our tries come from kicks in the oppositions twenty, we have a dearth of creative players, Morgan has us playing to our current strengths.
FC do usually go to five drives and a kick, it's there plan A, B and C. We need to put them under enough constant pressure to ensure that they stick to that, I do not want to see Long feeling as if he's got enough room to start being creative.
General Zod. wrote:What I don't understand is why folk seem to think FC's pack is bigger and better than ours when Rovers is far taller and heavier man-for-man whilst being fitter.
I don't think they are bigger and better but they're certainly more mobile and more capable of getting a roll on. We absolutley need to dominate them early on, they ran over us last time. I want to see Fisher start, for me he's still our best defender around the ruck.