Joined: Apr 04 2004 Posts: 2484 Location: North West
I posted this yersterday on our board
Im pretty sure the referees genuinely do not know the rules
As a crusaders player was tackling roby as soon as roby made contact with the ground the tackle was complete, when it left his hand backwards he lost it after the tackle was complete..simple decision
Its amazing he decison was roby never lost possession with the ball which is a blatant lie, eddie seemed fascinated with it going backwards but the tackle was already complete
I don't understand some people in here. It "evened" out. You mean the emmit no try, where the ball was held up off the deck? unless the ball is two foot long, it was not a try.
The roby decision was either a knock on, or double movement. Take your pick
Joined: Mar 08 2002 Posts: 4799 Location: Now the Man from Oswestry.
Still seething about it as it was the match breaker. However, as Stevo's wont to say 'read it in the papers', and before people start slagging off Stuart Cummings they might like to consider that his problem might be that he can't get the staff.
Freedom for supporters of the government, only for members of one party - however numerous they may be - is no freedom at all. freedom is always and exclusively for one who thinks differently. Rosa Luxemburg, 'Die russiche Revolution'.
Joined: Jan 15 2004 Posts: 3422 Location: Cronulla
Noel Cleal wrote:Its amazing what biterness success causes. Emmitts "No Try" and Robys try evened themselves out. Both were unclear, to the letter of the law both should have been given benefit of the doubt.
Not talking about the Emmitt no try, but I dont think you even know what the benefit of the doubt rule is. Unclear doesnt equal try... No way could benefit of the doubt be applied to the Roby try. Get over yourself and your 'success', that has nothing to do with a shocking decision.
Saddened wrote:Pat Richards is poop. A typical, average, run of the mill NRL outside back. Nothing special at all. Like Barrett he is a myth. He is solid enough, he can catch, he can kick goals.
Joined: Feb 21 2007 Posts: 5793 Location: back in cas vegas
cod'ead wrote:Clearly?
Did you have another camera angle not available to Smith or the rest of the viewing public?
The only clear thing about it was a clear case of "benefit of doubt"
Spot on, it looks like the defender may have got his arm under the ball but you cant be certain with what was shown that he did, therefoe it should have been try-benefit of the doubt.
The roby 'try' was a shocker though, as bad as the watts 'try' earlier this season.
when the score got to 50 we shouted for more, up popped brad davis went over for four.....
......and its no nay never no nay never no more will we face religation......
big barrie mac.' the cas forads av been bob on'
chissitt wrote:Pyeman I wish you would stop talking so much sense. I am in danger of becomming one of your biggest fans.
vastman wrote:Westerman looks the most promising for a long time.
Leyther_Matt wrote:The best proper 'rugby pub' in the country has to be the Boot Room at Cas
Bolton_Warrior wrote:The only time I ever doubted going to watch Wigan was when we bare face cheated to stay in superleague
Danril wrote: Last night, despite being poor and not deserving the win, we should have won.
Joined: Aug 29 2006 Posts: 1859 Location: Chorley Panthers
It was a knock on and a bad decision, The Emmit 'no try' was correct,no way did he get that ball down so that was 1 bad call by the Video Ref..Silverwood and his 2 flag carrying spectators made many bad calls for both sides, He could spoil a great final next week, but Smith, Thaler, Alibert and co are no better
King piemon wrote - What a pile of $hit
It was cack the whole team and i for one aint impressed
AJ wrote - Sean Long once again tore us to pieces. Its all well and good us singing Sean Long is a W@nker, but he was laughing back along by conducting the chant whilst ripping us to bits.
Robinson wrote - Saints - it depends on whether the side can get over their mental block. We're more than capable of beating 'Dads Army', but it appears that Wigan still shiit themselves at the mere sight of a red V.
pyeman wrote:Spot on, it looks like the defender may have got his arm under the ball but you cant be certain with what was shown that he did, therefoe it should have been try-benefit of the doubt.
The roby 'try' was a shocker though, as bad as the watts 'try' earlier this season.
Watts scored, roby didn't. They are nothing alike
HULL KINGSTON ROVERS is my religion, Craven Park is my church and Jordan Abdull is my God
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 30 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
best quote ever .that phrase made full metal jacket for me
