Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:42 pm
EHW
Club Owner
Joined: Nov 02 2003 Posts: 8627
bramleyrhino wrote:The problem is that the stories that the clubs / the RFL want to generate aren't the stories that print press are interested in.
The national press aren't interested in "xxx signs one year contract" or "Fringe player opens village fete". They are however interested when a player is arrested following a nightclub brawl, caught drink-driving or in some other scandal - something that no club is going to try and promote. That's not a rugby league problem, that's a problem for any sport. Just today, for example, Joe Cole is on the BBC News front page because of a driving offence - it's probably the first and last time that he'll be found anywhere other than the sports pages. Likewise with John Terry / Peter Crouch.
It's very easy to say that the clubs should be producing the PR (and some, undoubtedly, could do more) but the what the clubs want to say and what the press wants to hear are two very different things.
In order to get the coverage that the sport craves, it has to be mass appeal. That means attracting a greater demographic of fan, establishing a strong international scene and getting the sport on the national conscience. When enough people, who don't have access to the YEP, HDM or Wigan Evening Post, want to hear about rugby league, the advertisers and the press will meet that demand. Unfortunately, there is huge fan opposition along the M62 to expanding the game to do just that. The RFL is dammed if it does and dammed if it doesn't.
agreed to all of that - and to a certain extent its no fault of the clubs, who are trying to appeal to their own market with 'XXX signs new contract' and 'YYY opens village fete' type stories.
however, the RFL needs to take a lead in identifying and producing the stories that might have a mass appeal. if they send out well written PR stories that sports editors can just rip off, it wont matter that they dont have specific RL journalists trying to dig things up.
Look at the RFL website latest news - its all either negative (players being banned) or pointless (Eorl Crabtree's testimonial dinner). Not one thing that would be of interest to a national sports editor.
couple of examples of stories that might have a wider appeal off the top of my head - Jonny Lomax battling back from a life threatening injury as a kid to Saints superstar, or Ryan Bailey's redemption from jailbird to Leeds Cup Final hero. i.e. personal stories, heartwarming tales of triumph and battling through adversity.
Force the clubs to make the players available to the media more. Get some players in London every week doing the media rounds.
How much national press does the Steve Prescott story get? The fact that he is guest of honour at the cup final doesn't even warrant a mention on the RFL site. Has anyone from the RFL attempted to highlight his charitable efforts, his fight against cancer, and his OBE. Blitzing the media with that story the week before the Cup Final would be fantastic for the game - and for Steve's charity.
The game cant sit back and do nothign, then complain that the media and sponsors are not battling the way to Red Hall.
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:56 pm
Leaguefan
International Chairman
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 9721 Location: Cougarville
SL clubs wanted to "go it alone"
They created their own "business" and sod the hindmost!
The one thing the SL clubs are REALLY good at is marketing and media relations.
You can tell by the column inches they get. The whole x minutes they gate DAILY on SKY (sports) Mo & Rons Ball Game News channel and the whole daily y minutes they get on the beeb.
Add to that the z minutes on ITV and the non existant acknowledgement the game even exists on Channels 4 & 5 .
So that is ALL the major media in GB covered.
Regarding radio, Radio Mong won't touch it nor will Radio 2. Radio 3 is so far up it's superior air that it couldn't care less and Radio 4 may still cover the colonial game of cricket and mention the establishment sports of Oxbridge.
Radio 5 is Mo & Rons Ball Game orientated and demotes RL to DAB if it can be bothered
As for Talk(sport) Mo & Rons Ball Game it covers nowt else except Mo & Rons Ball Game.
Don't blame the RFL for the inadequacies of the SL clubs.
They made their bed they have to lie on it regarding media promotion etc.
regards
and ENJOY your sport
Leaguefan
"The Public wants what the Public gets" - Paul Weller
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 3:58 pm
Catalancs
Club Coach
Joined: Jan 28 2006 Posts: 18736 Location: Baix Empordà, Catalunya
Judder Man wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, but wasn,t there a statement last year from the RFL that the Daily Mirror was to be the media *voice" for rugby league.
Can't correct you as I don't remember that statement. Today's Mirror had small corner of rugby league news just after the horse racing section. I'd say The People is probably the best national for rugby league nowadays.
RLFans.com Soccer Prediction League Champion 2011/2012
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:37 pm
j.c
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 05 2009 Posts: 6858
Billinge_Lump wrote:Is there a sport that isn't?
Quote: yes, football,cricket and union.
That describes football as well, is that a dying sport?
the championship 'not long ago'was the fourth most followed league in europe,so i would say that leagues doing ok.
by the way i didnt say RL was a dieing sport.i said two thirds of its member club were dieing on there booty and 7 or 8 clubs in SL are living from hand to mouth.
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:44 pm
Asgardian13
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 31 2005 Posts: 3726 Location: Northamptonshire
Media coverage used to be even worse. When I came down to London University from Warrington in 1973, the only paper which was guaranteed to print on a monday Sunday's RL results was the socialist rag, the Morning Star! RL coverage has not been too bad in more recent years, although I agree that in the last three or four, it's gone backwards again.
There's no doubt that wendyball is seriously to blame, as even the 'quality' papers are obsessed with it. It's not dissimilar abroad. In Italy they have two daily 'sports' papers which are 85% wendyball with the balance shared between motor racing, basketball, volleyball and athletics. A while ago The Guardian reprinted it's coverage of the 1966 World Cup wendyball final - you know, the one England actually won. The entire thing was about five paragraphs long. Were this to happen today ( thankfully unlikely with the dross that count as pro-wendyballers in this country ) The Guardian would have a 16-page supplement!
I'm sad for Chris Irvine, and the Times can sod off - I can't imagine anyone paying to access their website.
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:56 pm
Catalancs
Club Coach
Joined: Jan 28 2006 Posts: 18736 Location: Baix Empordà, Catalunya
Asgardian13 wrote:Media coverage used to be even worse. When I came down to London University from Warrington in 1973, the only paper which was guaranteed to print on a monday Sunday's RL results was the socialist rag, the Morning Star! RL coverage has not been too bad in more recent years, although I agree that in the last three or four, it's gone backwards again.
That socialist rag used to cause my normally 40 minute paper round to take an hour or so. Rugby League news and results from Division 1 right down to amateur level.
Asgardian13 wrote:There's no doubt that wendyball is seriously to blame, as even the 'quality' papers are obsessed with it. It's not dissimilar abroad. In Italy they have two daily 'sports' papers which are 85% wendyball with the balance shared between motor racing, basketball, volleyball and athletics. A while ago The Guardian reprinted it's coverage of the 1966 World Cup wendyball final - you know, the one England actually won. The entire thing was about five paragraphs long. Were this to happen today ( thankfully unlikely with the dross that count as pro-wendyballers in this country ) The Guardian would have a 16-page supplement!
A rugby league journalist friend was told to 'take the weekend off' following the death of Bobby Robson. In the following days there wasn't enough space for rugby league and a few other sports.
RLFans.com Soccer Prediction League Champion 2011/2012
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 4:59 pm
j.c
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 05 2009 Posts: 6858
Catalancs wrote:Take your Lobby specs off for just a second and stand back. This is a problem for rugby league not just the horrible, nasty Super League.
i know its a problem for RL.the only problem with this is..SL is suppose to be dragging the rest of RL along with it but thats not happening is it. whilst the 'nasty SL,your words ya baby,continues to get more sky money and a few clubs are getting more supporters through the gates,the rest of the pro game [and i include some SL clubs in this]are going nowhere.
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:11 pm
j.c
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 05 2009 Posts: 6858
gutterfax wrote:Hey...you hark back to the good old days all you like when RL was an honest sport in your opinion, but if you have a point to make, it sometimes gets lost if you throw in a personal insult. Kind of like another of your anti expanionist rants on another thread....
So, I see from this that you take your lead from your chairman/ceo who spat his dummy out when his team didn't get a place at the top table last time around....BITTER is an understatement
As for me being a gobshite.........maybe, but your post regarding the good old days points to you being someone who can't deal with change. If you think British Rugby League was in a better state in 1995 to the current situation, please tell us why you think this is.
its difficult not to throw in insults with people as patronizing as you.
am i harking back to 1995 or just to the inception of SLE?im not sure.
can you bring the rest of that post forward please so that people can judge it in its entirety[then they can slag me off if they choose to.thanks in advance.
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:14 pm
Catalancs
Club Coach
Joined: Jan 28 2006 Posts: 18736 Location: Baix Empordà, Catalunya
j.c wrote:i know its a problem for RL.the only problem with this is..SL is suppose to be dragging the rest of RL along with it but thats not happening is it. whilst the 'nasty SL,your words ya baby,continues to get more sky money and a few clubs are getting more supporters through the gates,the rest of the pro game [and i include some SL clubs in this]are going nowhere.
While some clubs are growing, working on advertising, marketing, facilities, community, player standard, others just sit on their backsides expecting some kind of helping hand. I think rugby league at club level is being dragged towards the lower end rather than the top.
RLFans.com Soccer Prediction League Champion 2011/2012
Post subject: Re: The Times - rugby league is DEAD
Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:16 pm
j.c
Player Coach
Joined: Oct 05 2009 Posts: 6858
gutterfax wrote:Hey...you hark back to the good old days all you like when RL was an honest sport in your opinion, but if you have a point to make, it sometimes gets lost if you throw in a personal insult. Kind of like another of your anti expanionist rants on another thread....
So, I see from this that you take your lead from your chairman/ceo who spat his dummy out when his team didn't get a place at the top table last time around....BITTER is an understatement
As for me being a gobshite.........maybe, but your post regarding the good old days points to you being someone who can't deal with change. If you think British Rugby League was in a better state in 1995 to the current situation, please tell us why you think this is.
because once it was a sport now its a box ticking competition.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum