retro_muz wrote:Look, Hull FC, Hull City, the West Hull community…..
So Hull City are a West Hull only team?
retro_muz wrote:I’ve no idea how many times HKR have had money from the council, but whether it be once, twice or a hundred times how much will it really equate too when compared with the 40 Million spent in West Park...
You're really not grasping the raison d'etre of the KC stadium, are you?
retro_muz wrote:Yes, and i can get to the KC no problem.
Aye, most people in Hull can, as well as giving easy access to those coming off the Clive Sullivan Way - that's why it was built there.... as a facility benefiting the whole of Hull.
retro_muz wrote:
But surly it would be a good thing for Craven Parks local community to have similar local facilities, local not being a 30min bus journey then a 15-20min walk.
You are joking, aren't you? What populace of East Hull, never mind all of Hull are "local" to the New CP? It actually takes less time - and is far more convenient with less walking - for me (a West Hull resident) to get via coach to many Super League grounds than to navigate the nightmare using public transport that a journey to your place entails. Your 30 min bus journey and a 15-20 min walk is a dream of a journey to most contemplating a trip to the New CP.
retro_muz wrote:The Hull City Council would be helping out a club from Hull, supported by residents from Hull and improving an area of Hull, its not like the money would be going abroad or wasted on something that wouldn't be used.
It's the back of beyond, mate. Realistically, how many other prime community locations should the Council consider BEFORE Craven Park?
retro_muz wrote:If the council invest in a new North stand then yes i'd expect them to take rent (on the North stand) or a cut of profits made. I mentioned it earlier they could take 75% of all takings to begin with and then perhaps decrease this to 50% as the money is repaid, or something along those lines...?
Ah - the crux of the matter.
Can Rovers afford this? Is not the reason they need the council input in the first place that they need to increase their crowds? They are placing all the eggs in the basket of the improvements doing this. If they don't (and your crowds are dropping even though your capacity is not reached) then you may have negotiated a white elephant here. No significant progress towards the 10K Hudge has stressed is the minimum break-even target before the board get cold feet and call time, and a new drain of funds to the council to boot.
Be careful what you wish for.