Some of the more sensible posters on here appear to be banging their head against a brick wall. Some Rovers fans will never be convinced of anything other than the council literally threw £43 million quid at Hull FC to build themselves a nice shiney new stadium anywhere they wanted and which they could use free of charge. No way in hell was there a whole consultation process with several possible sites considered and the best possible site chosen based on things like transport links. No Sireeeee it was all down to Hull FC demanding the council build them a stadium and only in the exact position they want. In fact I can exclusively reveal that the ONLY reason the stadium was built was so that Hull FC could get one over on Rovers. Fact.

Is it time to take the p1$$ out of FC for being tennants and having a really unfavourable rent agreement whilst pointing out we dont even own our stadium and football rule the roost yet?

Costs FC hundreds of thousands to play at The Kentucky Fooky Chucky, they don't even own it and the players have to clean all The Tiggers boots on a Sunday morning.

This has come about because it was all and only Rovers fans involved in the consultation every step of the way.

There is also one of those hideous green and orange Matchwinner kits buried under the half way line that I put a Romany curse on, back when I was a Romany from Romney Marsh before I found true love with gingerspice and moved to America, which with hindsight was a poor decision as it's costing me a fortune in plane tickets as a season pass holder and shoes because of all the ones I've ruined by crying on them when she calls me a mental.

Councils the length and breadth of the UK routinely offer support to businesses. The "return" they recieve is new jobs or safeguarding existing jobs and a boost to the local economy. Keeping businesses in business and paying business rates, people in employment paying rent and council tax as opposed to receiving rent allowance and benefits.

An economist might also cite the multiplier effect but I fear it would be lost on most posters who hold your stance on this argument.

Guarantee no, because the businesses need to be able to prove competence to carry out the work, but as long as they are then there is nothing wrong with the council awarding the contracts to local companies, even if they are more expensive than an out of town business.

80% of current rovers fans weren't watching the club when those accusations were flying around

Well this wasn't great:


after i had written this:


So can everyone, please take this as a final warning? Rhetorical question.

Preston Road got 56 million through NDC and East Park has had just had over 10 million I believe on it's transformation. East Hull gets it's share.

Phil Webbo would probably of been in his element here as a poster but I assume his return to Form as a Branshplme Councillor means he is now verbally shackled.

75/50% of all takings from a new North Stands ticket sales, the percentage decreasing year on year...
100% of takings from any other facilities thrown into a new Stand and which are ran by the council...

The Hull City Council would be helping out a club from Hull, supported by residents from Hull and improving an area of Hull, its not like the money would be going abroad or wasted on something that wouldn't be used.

I don’t know what gets spent and where but you’re absolutely right East Hull does get its fair share, my post you’ve quoted maybe sounds like I’m stood caressing a violin on behalf of East Hull, I’m not.

At the end of the day it goes back to the petition the Rovers fan group submitted asking for a slice of the King Comms profit to improve Craven Park, profit which Hull City & FC have done well from. (which is great)

FC fans: ‘Well Rovers had their chance to play at the KC’
Rovers fans: ‘Never going to happen the clubs based in East Hull’
Etc etc, blah blah blah

Personally I’d be happy with a couple of million to help, I don’t expect anything like the scale of the KC/West park development and i don't think the petition is asking for that.

Would you agree that rovers should start to pay proper rent on the stadium if the council do dip their hands into their pocket?