El Pac Carnegie wrote:Hasn't he had 3 reasonably long term injuries in the last 4 seasons?
At most 2. Besides, injury proneness is usually associated with muscle injuries such as groin strains, hamstring injuries etc, indicating an area of weakness. Breaks and ligament damage don't indicate someone is 'prone' to injury.
Joined: Aug 05 2002 Posts: 14094 Location: He can smoke a pound in a single bound!
Robbie Rotten wrote:He won't be top class, obviously, but he'd have been a reliable squad player. He was much better than Warnock was at that age, and Warnock's gone on to be pretty good. Insua was one of the best full backs of his age class, he also counted as a homegrown player. Shame, he was a solid squad player, just needed somebody to play ahead of him as he was far too inexperienced to be playing as regularly as he did.
I'm surprised we've got shut before a replacement was signed.
I'm not Jesus Christ, I've come to accept that now.
[quote][b]XBrettKennyX wrote:[/b] Once more the anti SC brigade, purposely or otherwise fail to see the point.
Mark wrote:Were like this when they spent 5 million to have Robbie Keane for 5 months.
They where because, of course, Keane was the perfect partner to Torres and the goals they would score would produce the title. You'd think they'd have learnt by now, eh.
[quote="Newsom 13"]You're the Ginger Journo Scouser. Not me.[/quote]
[quote="WireFanatic"]Never agree much with a bluenose.......but in this case I will make an exception. ;)[/quote]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
