If you lose a wicket chasing a small target the target should go up, give teams something to think about instead of sending in clunkers to try and finish it. If the Windies had lost those two wickets last night, and they'd cost say 6 runs a piece, target 72 - different game.
JWP wrote:If the Windies had lost those two wickets last night, and they'd cost say 6 runs a piece, target 72 - different game.
They way I did it when we were playing T20 (for predicting scores) was double what they had after 12 then take off 10 for every wicket lost and that was usually pretty close so say each wicket bumped the required score by 10, again it's a totally different game.
Joined: Apr 03 2003 Posts: 28186 Location: A world of my own ...
I see Mr Duckworth is backing his system but questioning whether five overs per side is enough to constitute a valid match as it distorts the statistical validity.
"As you travel through life don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things" - George Carlin
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
