Joined: Sep 03 2005 Posts: 7647 Location: The Midlands
As could be expected, Impact's rating went quite a bit up and Raw's went quite a bit down.
One hell of a show on Impact this week, they will deliberately have targeted Raw due to the lack of Raw stars being there, lets see if it pays off in the long term.
Joined: Dec 22 2001 Posts: 5893 Location: Warrington
UK Viewing Figures: For the week ending 11th April TNA iMPACT! got 110,000 for the Saturday 9pm slot making it the number 1 watched show on Bravo that week. They also got an extra 37,000 on Bravo+1
RAW got 127,000 for the live showing plus 47,000 and 41,000 for replay slots Smackdown! got 104,000 for the first showing plus 35,000, 34,000 and 32,000 for replay slots NXT got 32,000 on first showing and 29,000 for replay Superstars got 19,000
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
lister wrote:UK Viewing Figures: For the week ending 11th April TNA iMPACT! got 110,000 for the Saturday 9pm slot making it the number 1 watched show on Bravo that week. They also got an extra 37,000 on Bravo+1
RAW got 127,000 for the live showing plus 47,000 and 41,000 for replay slots Smackdown! got 104,000 for the first showing plus 35,000, 34,000 and 32,000 for replay slots NXT got 32,000 on first showing and 29,000 for replay Superstars got 19,000
Bloody hell 19,000 for Superstars?! No expert on viewing figures for Sky in general, but that's extremely low in anyones' book isn't it?
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
I without question look forward to TNA more than WWE at the moment.
If I had to make up a card for a Wrestlemania right now, I would far rather have TNA's roster at my disposal than WWE's.
The lack of performers that are actually exciting to watch and that you would look forward to going to watch now in WWE is scary. For me, that list would probably consist of Taker, Orton, Morrison and Jericho. There are some promising signs from a few - the Miz is coming across well at the moment and I can see something decent happening with Dolph Ziggler but after the names I've mentioned I'm struggling to find why you would tune in to WWE at the moment.
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
Danny 2 wrote:hope its better this time
Yeah, pretty poor the first one wasn't it. The graphics, presentation etc were fantastic IMO, but was just the gameplay (the most important part though) which was a letdown. Hopefully be big improvement this time though.
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
[/quote]
No expert on viewing figures for Sky in general, but that's extremely low in anyones' book isn't it? 
The graphics, presentation etc were fantastic IMO, but was just the gameplay (the most important part though) which was a letdown. 
Hopefully be big improvement this time though. 
