Joined: Sep 03 2005 Posts: 7647 Location: The Midlands
ST_CONROY wrote:Charles Woodson. Defensive Player of the Year says hello.
Ex-Raider dontcha know.
We won't make the playoffs even with McNabb imo, outside Gallery we don't have an O-Line, we have 2 good recievers (1 is a TE) and the secondary is too poor.
Joined: Jan 04 2006 Posts: 7069 Location: Green Bay
Jint wrote:Slightly padded stats, as people actually throw at him.
True....
Also to be fair, he isn't the best CB. Revis, Namdi are better pure CB's in that they are able to pretty much shut down one player and they get nothing. Wood, can do that, but he is also able to cover anybody and does alot of blitzing/run support etc, so is the better player.
Joined: Jan 04 2006 Posts: 7069 Location: Green Bay
V For Vendetta wrote:Ex-Raider dontcha know.
We won't make the playoffs even with McNabb imo, outside Gallery we don't have an O-Line, we have 2 good recievers (1 is a TE) and the secondary is too poor.
I think you'd have a pretty decent offence and you already have an underrated defence.
You could see, from the limited amount i watched the Raiders last year, that the players seemed to physically give more for Gradkowski than Russell and believed in him far more. McNabb is far better than Gradkowski and i think could bring it together. You have decent recievers and a decent RB group.
I seriously think if you got McNabb and kept Namdi you could push for a wildcard (and get it).
Joined: Jan 04 2006 Posts: 7069 Location: Green Bay
Not a bad draft Gaslight, i disagree with a few picks. Specifically Tampa, no way they pass Suh, they love him. Likewise i don't see Kindle, Mays or Pouncey going anywhere near that high. I'm in the process of doing my mock so i'll post it when it's done.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum