Mild Rover wrote:Evening all. I'm not allowed to use the ignore function. If I don't want read somebody's posts I have to ban them. I do however need something approaching a just cause to do that.
So the derby is approaching and excitement is no doubt starting to mount. It is spilling over into silliness across a number of threads already. Now the result of the derby may provide you with an opportunity to revel in victory and mock the defeated - but slightly less so if you've been banned for a fortnight from here. Hopefully that should provide ample incentive to post in a mostly constructive and sensible manner, over the next couple of weeks at least. Look at it from my point of view - ask yourself 'would Mild Rover's Easter weekend be slightly better if I was temporarily banned from the Rovers board?'. If the answer is 'yes', then you should be avoiding giving me or the other mods any reason to suspend your posting rights.
Conversley it may mean you don't have the opportunity to take the peez out of them
Mild Rover wrote:Evening all. I'm not allowed to use the ignore function. If I don't want read somebody's posts I have to ban them. I do however need something approaching a just cause to do that.
So the derby is approaching and excitement is no doubt starting to mount. It is spilling over into silliness across a number of threads already. Now the result of the derby may provide you with an opportunity to revel in victory and mock the defeated - but slightly less so if you've been banned for a fortnight from here. Hopefully that should provide ample incentive to post in a mostly constructive and sensible manner, over the next couple of weeks at least. Look at it from my point of view - ask yourself 'would Mild Rover's Easter weekend be slightly better if I was temporarily banned from the Rovers board?'. If the answer is 'yes', then you should be avoiding giving me or the other mods any reason to suspend your posting rights.
So if you don't like what we say we get banned? Surely decisions like this should be made in the interests of the board and not individual moderators!
It's like when you're at school and the headteacher confiscates your ball because one of the fat kids got hit with it at play time.
Joined: Jan 02 2003 Posts: 43413 Location: rlfans flying wing man
Mild Rover wrote:Evening all. I'm not allowed to use the ignore function. If I don't want read somebody's posts I have to ban them. I do however need something approaching a just cause to do that.
So the derby is approaching and excitement is no doubt starting to mount. It is spilling over into silliness across a number of threads already. Now the result of the derby may provide you with an opportunity to revel in victory and mock the defeated - but slightly less so if you've been banned for a fortnight from here. Hopefully that should provide ample incentive to post in a mostly constructive and sensible manner, over the next couple of weeks at least. Look at it from my point of view - ask yourself 'would Mild Rover's Easter weekend be slightly better if I was temporarily banned from the Rovers board?'. If the answer is 'yes', then you should be avoiding giving me or the other mods any reason to suspend your posting rights.
east hull FC fan wrote:So if you don't like what we say we get banned? Surely decisions like this should be made in the interests of the board and not individual moderators!
It's like when you're at school and the headteacher confiscates your ball because one of the fat kids got hit with it at play time.
I thought that, so if you constantly disagree with a mod your banned, who monitors the mods posts..
Not implying MR is like that as I find him a sensible mod tbf.
Hutchie wrote:On the rare occasion i pop over there, i have to say that there are some good debates.
Heaven forbid if you disagree with Redroo or Sextons though
Oh and one user called Andy talks complete bollox 24/7
who could andy be?
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
east hull FC fan wrote:So if you don't like what we say we get banned? Surely decisions like this should be made in the interests of the board and not individual moderators!
It's like when you're at school and the headteacher confiscates your ball because one of the fat kids got hit with it at play time.
No. In the next sentence I pointed out that I need a reason to ban people. I actually don't want to ban anybody, but if things carry on in the direction they were heading yesterday, IMO, it would be in the interests of the board to consider that option. It was a warning that I felt things were heading in the wrong direction. I wouldn't ban people for expessing an opinion that I dislike (short of racism or similar stuff covered by the AUP) - but if people consistently post in a destructive, inflammatory or negative manner, even if the underlying opinion might be valid, that becomes a problem and stifles discussion.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Jan 15 2007 Posts: 11924 Location: Secret Hill Top Lair. V.2
east hull FC fan wrote:So if you don't like what we say we get banned? Surely decisions like this should be made in the interests of the board and not individual moderators!
It's like when you're at school and the headteacher confiscates your ball because one of the fat kids got hit with it at play time.
Far be it for me to defend Obergruppenführer Mild Rover (but I may as well try and score a few points as I undoubtadley will be adding to the rubbish on here pre Derby) but I think the salient point of his post was the sentance after the one you highlighted.
Mild Rover wrote:Evening all. I'm not allowed to use the ignore function. If I don't want read somebody's posts I have to ban them. I do however need something approaching a just cause to do that.
He clearly states that he isn't going to ban people just because he doesn't like what they say.
EDIT: As I said, I don't need to defend Obergruppenführer Mild Rover, he's done it himself whilst I was on the phone.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground. They want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its many waters. This struggle may be a moral one; or it may be a physical one; or it may be both moral and physical; but it must be a struggle.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
berrigans bitch wrote:I thought that, so if you constantly disagree with a mod your banned, who monitors the mods posts..
Not implying MR is like that as I find him a sensible mod tbf.
We are answerable to admin. Anybody who clearly crosses the AUP line should be warned/banned. In less clear cut cases, previous good behaviour and value added is likely to be considered. This is subjective, I admit. However, if you (not you specifically ) suspect that I might think you don't have much credit left, now is not a good time to be posting incautiously.
Anybody who wishes to sensibly discuss this further should pm me.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 95 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
) suspect that I might think you don't have much credit left, now is not a good time to be posting incautiously.
