Big Dave T wrote:No. Rovers will have agreed with Cooke an amount that was acceptable to him to terminate the contract. (compromise agreement is the technical term)

If for example Cooke is on 120k and he would earn 80k over the next 7 months with contracts running November to November it may be that Cooke accepted a fee of 40k to leave knowing he would be earning a wage from the next day at Wakey, thus saving Rovers 40k. (**figures are all made up, i dont know what the real deal is)

cravenpark1 wrote:Now we can slag someone else off on this site no more cookie hurrah who is next

cravenpark1 wrote:Now we can slag someone else off on this site no more cookie hurrah who is next

clubfoot fc wrote:Ratu seems to be getting the same treatment from morgan so why not him?

MrPhilb wrote:Ratu reinjured his hamstring against Huddersfield

clubfoot fc wrote:Did he?

Sure i heard morgan say a couple of weeks ago he had a fully fit squad to choose from.

Basil Fawlty wrote:That's great for you to take so much notice about Rovers ... if half your mob dropped down dead don't think I'd realise!

Basil Fawlty wrote:That's great for you to take so much notice about Rovers ... if half your mob dropped down dead don't think I'd realise!

clubfoot fc wrote:Did he?

Sure i heard morgan say a couple of weeks ago he had a fully fit squad to choose from.