Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
reddan wrote:On what evidence? Playing there for Donny? Hardly proof he can play such a pivotal position in super league.
we will never know unless he is given a shot at it
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Mrs Barista wrote:Wonder what the hold-up is now that the Wakey game is past - would assume an announcement early in the week.
According to Radio Humberside this morning the hold up is to do with a confidentility agreement Rovers want Cooke to sign but he isnt too keen. Sounds like both clubs have agreed the fees etc.
If you are not part of the solution then you are more likely part of the problem...
Joined: Oct 15 2003 Posts: 53839 Location: North Yorkshire
knocker norton wrote:According to Radio Humberside this morning the hold up is to do with a confidentility agreement Rovers want Cooke to sign but he isnt too keen. Sounds like both clubs have agreed the fees etc.
He wants to tell all about his move from FC to KR in his book and Rovers are not keen. If I were Cooke I would sit and take the wages, why should he be silenced?
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
PAUL M wrote:He wants to tell all about his move from FC to KR in his book and Rovers are not keen. If I were Cooke I would sit and take the wages, why should he be silenced?
I have always thought he would dish the dirt once he left Rovers, I doubt there is nothing anyone can do about it, except sue him if its bollox.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
PAUL M wrote:He wants to tell all about his move from FC to KR in his book and Rovers are not keen. If I were Cooke I would sit and take the wages, why should he be silenced?
Surely, the major factor silencing him now would be the supposed threat of a legal case from Hull? I wonder if they might officially call it off now.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
knocker norton wrote:According to Radio Humberside this morning the hold up is to do with a confidentility agreement Rovers want Cooke to sign but he isnt too keen. Sounds like both clubs have agreed the fees etc.
How strange. We have been told ad nauseam that Rovers acted perfectly throughout. Surely they'd jump at the chance to have the truth in the public domain and would be encouraging Cooke to make this public, to "put up or shut up", even?
Mild Rover wrote:Surely, the major factor silencing him now would be the supposed threat of a legal case from Hull? I wonder if they might officially call it off now.
Clearly not the major factor as I dont suppose Rovers are determined to pursue a confidentiality agreement just to protect Paul Cooke. If Rovers want an agreement you can bet it is to protect themselves against something or why bother?
Hull dont have to do anything IMO. However I am sure they will watch for any Paul Cooke revelations with interest.
If you are not part of the solution then you are more likely part of the problem...
Joined: Jul 31 2003 Posts: 36786 Location: Leafy Worcester, home of the Black Pear
Mild Rover wrote:Surely, the major factor silencing him now would be the supposed threat of a legal case from Hull? I wonder if they might officially call it off now.
The threat of a legal case has always been against Cooke (breach of contract) and not Rovers. Seems odd that Rovers would try to impose a confidentiality agreement to protect Cooke, and even odder that he wouldn't want to sign it.
Nothing involving Cooke is ever simple or straightforward, is it?
Hold on to me baby, his bony hands will do you no harm It said in the cards, we lost our souls to the Nameless One
Kosh wrote:The threat of a legal case has always been against Cooke (breach of contract) and not Rovers. Seems odd that Rovers would try to impose a confidentiality agreement to protect Cooke, and even odder that he wouldn't want to sign it.
Nothing involving Cooke is ever simple or straightforward, is it?
It might not be anything to do with the move but other incidents. Not saying i know anything but i bet there is loads that goes on behind closed doors at all clubs and sports
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
