I don't think the front row has been as big a problem for us as we first thought it would be, We've suffered more in the creative backs, the return of Galea will help a lot with this and take the pressure off Dobson a fair bit.
I'm certainly not getting carried away with yesterdays win, but its a damn site better than getting beaten by a depleted saints team and I'm certain that would have happened if we'd played them weeks 1 - 4.
Steady progress, props stepping up the mark, would personally like to see a bit more variation in attack but it's coming.
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 2397 Location: East Hull
pmh wrote:Very early days, yes it's not looking any where near the problem area it did at the end of last season but it's a long way away from what I'd describe as a powerbase.
Agreed on all accounts.
Joel looks more like the type of player that we already have with just abit more grunt (agreed we needed him though) If we wanted it to become a powerbase then we would need a player(s) like Faasavalu and Paleaaesina (spell check?)
[quote="Adeybull"] so the panel took the same view as your excellent assessment.[/quote]
Big Dave T wrote:Lovegrove has been getting better for the last 12-18 months. I've always been impressed when i've seen him, mainly due to his size.
Vella hasn't looked fit for a while and has been carrying the pack in the absence of Galea and Clinton imo but with Watts stepping up too it looks half decent. Still, wouldn't get carried away by getting a last gasp winning try vs a seriously depleted Saints side.
I dont think that anybody is getting carried away. Saints were no-where near full strength but most of their big guns were there upfront and our pack outplayed them. We wont be the soft touch down the middle that many would have had us believe pre-season.
"Dream Big..Work Hard".................. Sarah Storey, Paralympic Legend.
R.B.A wrote:I dont think that anybody is getting carried away.
Sorry must have mis-undertstood, your comment about your front row now looking like a powerbase after 1 good game was getting a little carried away wasn't it?
Big Dave T wrote:Sorry must have mis-undertstood, your comment about your front row now looking like a powerbase after 1 good game was getting a little carried away wasn't it?
Big Dave T wrote:Sorry must have mis-undertstood, your comment about your front row now looking like a powerbase after 1 good game was getting a little carried away wasn't it?
You said "getting carried away by a last gasp try against a depleted team". Nobody is getting carried away by that. The fact does remain though that the front row is becoming our powerbase. That is there for all to see and is not a case of getting carried away.
"Dream Big..Work Hard".................. Sarah Storey, Paralympic Legend.
R.B.A wrote:The fact does remain though that the front row is becoming our powerbase. That is there for all to see and is not a case of getting carried away.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12668 Location: Leicestershire.
I think the point is that Clinton and Watts have given Rovers two 'new' and physically bigger options at the prop spot. The losses of Fozzard and Aizue don't look so damaging now. With Vella, Lovegrove and Wheeldon we have a decent quintet to rotate. Netherton's versatility and defensive soundness will see him compete for a spot too. I know Mills has dropped off the radar, but as 7th choice props go, he ain't bad. And there is Beaumont coming through the ranks to.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
