Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Mrs Barista wrote:The opposite one to where the ball and Dobson are.
If he is so $hite, why were you lot up in arms with us and him when he signed for us, surely you would have been thanking us for taking him away from the KC.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
If he is so $hite, why were you lot up in arms with us and him when he signed for us, surely you would have been thanking us for taking him away from the KC.[/quote]
Becasue he was not $hite when you bought him off us also when he played for us everthing went through him in our team but at KR as someone else has posted everthing goes through Dobson also he doesnt play in his correct position making him play $hite
On the biggest change after returning to the Union code: "It's the first time I've been cold for seven years. I was never cold playing rugby league." - Jonathan Davis
Joined: Sep 18 2005 Posts: 8742 Location: 2017 City of Culture
Young Faithfull wrote:Becasue he was not $hite when you bought him off us also when he played for us everthing went through him in our team but at KR as someone else has posted everthing goes through Dobson also he doesnt play in his correct position making him play $hite
I think you need to look up the definition of "bought"
Joined: Sep 01 2006 Posts: 5139 Location: Wall Street
Scott_HKR wrote:It's a fine line whether cooke brings something to the team or whether he hinders dobson...
And whether he lines up at 13 or 6, it doesn't really matter, as hutchie said he plays the same cooke game wherever he plays.
I think its more like Dobson hinders Cooke in all honesty. To say Cooke plays the same whether at 6 or 13 is plainly wrong. This season from 13 he has done far more running and taking on of the line that at any time during his past 2 and a bit seasons. This has coincided with a running 6 in Webster which clearly doesn't work hence Rovers poor early season form and lack of try scoring opportunities. IMO Cooke is far more productive than Dobson and yet doesn't see anywhere near as much ball.
Motto of the week -
It is the way of the weak to secretly bleat to those in authority rather than fight their own battles.
I would imagine that if someone went thru the games and worked out a try assist/creation to possession received ratio then Cooke would indeed be streets ahead of Dobson. Dobson gets every scrap of ball yet our attacking stats are very poor....and thats without just the mechanics of getting the team to a good field position...
As i see it Cooke has the superior vision/game reading/handling and , Dobson is the superior attacking kicker and "zippier" player, cannot see why a coach would not try to maximise both players strengths(and try to minimise some major flaws..) for the benefit of the team.....but then again we know why...
And if JM persists with Dobson defending alongside Welham, then teams are going to just flood thru that area every week (and Jason Netherton and Galea when hes back are going to be cream crackered every week..)
Captain Charisma wrote:Cookes had a raw deal at the start of this year. He's been playing loose man, not stand off where he should be playing. If he had been playing there last night instead of I'Anson then we would have done no worse and probably better.
I have nothing against I'Anson but I don't think he did anything amazing, and Rovers for some reason dont use their stand off as much as they use their scrum half, in a playmaking sense. Everything revolves around Dobson in attack, Paul Cooke should be allowed to get more involved but seems to have been marginalised.
I think he's done well for us but he clearly isn't wanted in the team by Morgan, for whatever reason. So I'd have nothing against him leaving to better his career and take him off our salary cap. Same with Mills, he isn't gonna get in the side so loan him out/release him.
Thinly-veiled references to drug use - just say no. MR
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 97 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum