Big Dave T wrote:Could Cooke be the one to leave then to accomodate Clinton under the cap?
If you are sooooo worried - a thought... Rovers would have to have released a player prior to Clinton's signature to avoid salary cap breach... mind we could say it was an admin error and blame it on Rule ... this should be accepted as he has fallen foul before
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
Big Dave T wrote:I know that, but is it a coincidence that Cooke then isnt playing and is likely to be off somewhere else? (if Cooke had played today maybe he would have put you over the live cap since Clinton will play)
Irrespective of whether this batch of Cooke rumours are true, the RFL wouldn't have signed off on Clinton if it took us over the cap. It must have been a visa issue rather than a cap one.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Basil Fawlty wrote:If you are sooooo worried - a thought... Rovers would have to have released a player prior to Clinton's signature to avoid salary cap breach... mind we could say it was an admin error and blame it on Rule ... this should be accepted as he has fallen foul before
Why are you so touchy? I'm just trying to have a conversation with the adults on here about the Cooke situation, run along and ask you parents for permission to use the internet!
Maybe Cooke has already been de-registered to accomodate Clinton on the cap, that's my point really. It's no secret that Morgs has been trying to offload Cooke for the last 6 months.
Mild Rover wrote:Irrespective of whether this batch of Cooke rumours are true, the RFL wouldn't have signed off on Clinton if it took us over the cap. It must have been a visa issue rather than a cap one.
As ive just said to Basil, maybe Rovers have de-registered Cooke to accomodate Clinton hence Cooke been the one dropped from the squad and rumoured to be shipped out?
Big Dave T wrote:Why are you so touchy? I'm just trying to have a conversation with the adults on here about the Cooke situation, run along and ask you parents for permission to use the internet!
Maybe Cooke has already been de-registered to accomodate Clinton on the cap, that's my point really. It's no secret that Morgs has been trying to offload Cooke for the last 6 months.
I just managed to close the page down before they released I was communicating with a retard! "what was that daddy?.... coming!... yipee Cas here we come!"
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
Big Dave T wrote:Why are you so touchy? I'm just trying to have a conversation with the adults on here about the Cooke situation, run along and ask you parents for permission to use the internet!
Maybe Cooke has already been de-registered to accomodate Clinton on the cap, that's my point really. It's no secret that Morgs has been trying to offload Cooke for the last 6 months.
Cooke played against Hudds, after the Clinton signing had been officially announced. There maybe issues, I don't know, but I'm pretty sure they were/are seperate.
I know I'm guilty too, but Rovers vs Cas now please.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
Admin don't like 'retard' as an insult. Please avoid it.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Mild Rover wrote:Cooke played against Hudds, after the Clinton signing had been officially announced. There maybe issues, I don't know, but I'm pretty sure they were/are seperate.
I know I'm guilty too, but Rovers vs Cas now please.
OK, Cas by 20 but i dont think Rovers will be nilled this week.
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12664 Location: Leicestershire.
Big Dave T wrote::D OK, Cas by 20 but i dont think Rovers will be nilled this week.
For me today is an acid test. The beating by Wigan doesn't look quite so bad after their subsequent performances. Hudds was maybe just one of those days. We'll get a feel for where we really are today - bit nervous, but still hopeful.
'Thus I am tormented by my curiosity and humbled by my ignorance.' from History of an Old Bramin, The New York Mirror (A Weekly Journal Devoted to Literature and the Fine Arts), February 16th 1833.
Mild Rover wrote:For me today is an acid test. The beating by Wigan doesn't look quite so bad after their subsequent performances. Hudds was maybe just one of those days. We'll get a feel for where we really are today - bit nervous, but still hopeful.
Thing to remember too is that SL is that up and down for some teams there's always a chance. Some fairly even teams out there too that just need the rub of the green to get the victory. Saying that, with Sherwin back i think Cas are a pretty good side and will be very very tough for Rovers.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
