Maccbull_BigBullyBooaza wrote:Sorry.
There is of course nothing to say any alleged behaviour (which is not proved until an admission of guilt or a second test is carried out) began after any player started any contract.
Havent they already completed the testing (the tests were in November after all)? The reports I read seemed to be suggesting that guilt has already been proved, it was just a case of the RFL formally confirming the suspension?
Unless there is evidence that one club encouraged the drug taking I think it is fairly pointless trying to point a finger at either Bradford or Wakefield rather than just the player himself.
In the case of Ryan Hudson, didnt he admit that his downfall arose because of a desire to make a good initial impression at a new club, something for which neither is new or old club could be blamed.