R.B.A wrote:To be fair to Zod, he said that the rovers side was bigger and didnt narrow it down to just the pack. No idea if he is right and cant be bothered to check.
He is right. If you take the backs into account, which
are heavier than Hull's, Rovers average weight is 98kg and Hull's is 97kg. Although if you adjust for Mills, who inflates Rovers average weight as the heaviest player in both squads, and doesn't really feature,the average weights are the same. So the comment about Rovers being
certainly much heavier than Hull's looks somewhat of an exaggeration. I'm sure his prediction that Rovers will finish 3rd and Hull 9th, though, is accurate.