Joined: Mar 15 2009 Posts: 16166 Location: Foxborough, Massachusetts
Dead Man Walking wrote:I'd take Peyton Manning every single time over Tom Brady.
Good for you But Im afraid you would be very dissapointed come play-off time with a 9-9 record and only 1 SB ring to show for "the best QB ever" and that was against Rex Grossman . Hes no doubt one of the best in the stat department and has consistently got his team to the play-offs but when it comes to the play-offs themselves theres just something missing for me, the Saints were awesome last night after a slow start and deserved everything they got, Brees will be getting an even bigger contract extension than he was going to anyway.
Like I say he can have his MVPs and Brady can have his rings to look back on in the future I know which I would rather have
LFCRhino wrote:Good for you But Im afraid you would be very dissapointed come play-off time with a 9-9 record and only 1 SB ring to show for "the best QB ever" and that was against Rex Grossman . Hes no doubt one of the best in the stat department and has consistently got his team to the play-offs but when it comes to the play-offs themselves theres just something missing for me, the Saints were awesome last night after a slow start and deserved everything they got, Brees will be getting an even bigger contract extension than he was going to anyway.
Like I say he can have his MVPs and Brady can have his rings to look back on in the future I know which I would rather have
Give Brady Manning's O line, coaching consistency and a career with Harrison/Clark/Wayne/Gonzalez/Collie/Garcon instead of Caldwell/Bethel Johnson etc and I bet Brady puts up similar if not better numbers then Manning as well as more rings that what Choker has managed. Brady every time over Manning for me.
Ski wrote:I'd take one ring without cheating over three with...
01 v the Rams no evidence, no cheating 03 v Eagles, no tapes no cheating 04 v Panthers no tapes no cheating
Some people seem to be neglecting that football consists of offense and defense and the fact that the Patriots had one of the best defenses in football when they won those Super Bowls. Manning has rarely had the benefit of a truly dominant defense. Even when they did win the Super Bowl and their defense was suddenly on fire, their personnel was still nothing special.
Manning and Brady will go down as two of the best QB's in the NFL in the last decade and a half but despite Brady's rings, if I was picking a QB for my team it would have to be Manning every time.
Joined: Mar 03 2004 Posts: 5308 Location: On a hill above Mold, North Wales
LFCRhino wrote:and of course you can provide evidence of this cheating just like the Roger Goodell did...................oh wait a minute he never did, did he?
Brady showed just how "good" he is against the Ravens.
Down by 3 scores, he panics and starts chucking picks.
Manning on the other hand, down by 17 a few times, he engineers a comeback, and is by far the most dangerous QB after the two minute warning.
Super Bowls are one-off games that can be won by a big defensive play, as well as the offence getting it right. To be leading the stats after 12 years shows consistancy, thats why Favre is one of the all-time greats, he leads everything, and yet he's only got one ring...
Joined: Nov 05 2006 Posts: 3383 Location: On t'internet in Lancs.
ST CONROY In the middle of one of your rants about McDaniels Denver was your pick before the season as the #1 pick for the 2010 draft so i think the Chiefs will settle for an 8-8 season like the Broncos finished.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum