Roofaldo wrote:Another week of Raw, another week where Jerico (who's been kicked off the show TWICE in recent weeks) is back to get back on Raw. Wish they'd put this much effort into when other guys switch shows
It just saddened me last week when Jericho was put in that match because we all knew in NO way was Jericho going to be gone from RAW. He's the best heel they've got.
Don't let your love turn to hate Now we've got to keep the faith
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
Jeff the God of Biscuits wrote:It just saddened me last week when Jericho was put in that match because we all knew in NO way was Jericho going to be gone from RAW. He's the best heel they've got.
To be honest I'm surprised actually - I'd read he was going to fued with Edge when Edge returns (as a babyface), so figured this was been done to get him back on SmackDown for when the fued starts.
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
Finally seen both of the head-to-head shows from last week - TNA definitely edged it IMO. Raw with Hart was great (though without him it would have just been a run-of-the-mill show for me), but everyone with TNA clearly threw all they had into the show, e.g. the Style v Angle match, which was better then any WWE match I've seen since Taker v HBK at Mania. Big up to TNA, a lot of drama and intrigue I've not felt with WWE for a long time!!
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Joined: Dec 06 2003 Posts: 8224 Location: The Long, Dark Teatime of the Soul
The WWE Championship match for the Rumble will be Shamus vs Orton.
It's just a shame that WWE's idea of doing something different for number 1 contender match involves Cena Vs Orton MMMXVIII with Kofi Kingston thrown in as a random 3rd guy, simply so neither Cena or Orton has to get pinned
When you're a Bradford fan there's always a light at the end of the tunnel.
How utterly shambolic was TNA's big show with Hogan? Xpac, a 26 stone scott hall and a 68 year old Kevin Nash. Compare that to the RAW show with Bret Hart and you can see why TNA is a nothing wrestling federation
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
Braden Harvy wrote:How utterly shambolic was TNA's big show with Hogan? Xpac, a 26 stone scott hall and a 68 year old Kevin Nash. Compare that to the RAW show with Bret Hart and you can see why TNA is a nothing wrestling federation
None of whom contested the main event.
Also that 'nothing federation' had it's highest ever ratings, and is doing another UK arena tour in a few weeks.
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Roofs wrote:None of whom contested the main event.
Also that 'nothing federation' had it's highest ever ratings, and is doing another UK arena tour in a few weeks.
But this particular show had nothing to do with the main event in the same way Raw never. Interesting to note that TNAs highest ever rating was only for the 15 minute Hogan segment. After that the ratings plummeted
Joined: Aug 24 2005 Posts: 15807 Location: East Hull
Braden Harvy wrote:But this particular show had nothing to do with the main event in the same way Raw never. Interesting to note that TNAs highest ever rating was only for the 15 minute Hogan segment. After that the ratings plummeted
No they didn't, they levelled out at 2million which is still very good.
Oh, and as TNA has Tara I really don't see how you have an arguement.
"The Mail understands..." NOTHING!
[quote="-VIKINGMAN-"]Respect to Roofs, the president of East Hull. [/quote]
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum