Joined: Jun 05 2006 Posts: 2112 Location: Shouldercharging Fathead
Hmmmm, 279-6. Could be going the same way as the previous game, mehopes.
You've stolen my washing From out my back garden You've tarmacked my driveway Even though I said no You've nicked my lead flashing And weighed it in at the scrappy Oh St Helen's tatters Come rob me again
Joined: May 31 2005 Posts: 4064 Location: An exclusive mansion apartment in fashionable South London
This was probably a good toss to lose. If you put the opposition in you have to bowl them out within the first day's play (or equivalent in number of overs, i.e. 90 overs) and go on to take a significant first innings lead as far as I'm concerned. Fair enough, Kallis is a class act and without him as a fly in the ointment we might already be batting, and might yet go on to take that first innings lead.
Joined: Mar 05 2003 Posts: 4787 Location: Everywhere
Prince of Denmark wrote:But that would mean picking a side without a black African, so it's not likely to happen. A shame, as we're playing opponents who can't select their best XI. (And they wonder why Pietersen, Trott & others choose to make their future elsewhere. It's the new apartheid.)
Prince is a grinder; Duminy is overrated after a flattering start to his Test career. They're both good enough for Test cricket but not in great form and not quite as good as some of the English media have made them out to be.
It would appear you are on a par with the English media
airliebird9 wrote:I suppose it is allowable to post about the Aussies on an England cricket thread, but only because they're getting their butts reamed
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum