Mrs Barista wrote:TBF, being £3.2m in debt with a further £450k loss to come, you can see why they'd want to change the subject to an accounting policy that FC have adopted for at least 6 years that impacts neither debt nor profitability.
Tbh, while I would like the opportunity to occasionally discuss the sport of rugby league
as well, I'm don't feel the need to change the subject.
I'm not sure whether those that are blind to the context in which the losses have been made frustrate me more than those who ignore the cost of all the onfield progress. To both of them I'd say 'For better or worse, Hull's financial situation affects Rovers not one jot, neither diminishing or exacerbating the problem.'
Rovers team has come on massively in recent seasons. Even as a business, they are already an average performer by SL's (admittedly low) standards. Now though, it seems, a move towards profitabilty is becoming increasingly necessary.