Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Sthelens RLFC wrote:I thought that was basically what I had said in my previous post? We've got some fantastic indiviudals but that our squad depth is poor?
Sorry, I thought by squad players you meant those outside of the first 11 who only come in as cover. I was meaning that there are some who are first choice for you who wouldn't be good enough elsewhere.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Sam Buca wrote:Hence the placing of Carragher on the bench, he has been fantastic for Liverpool and is a fantastic defender but his form has dropped and he knows it. On his day Carra can quite easily be up there with the likes of JT.
Paul Scholes has been the best English footballer of the last 20 years, doesn't mean I'd currently pick him ahead of Gerrard. And it remains to be seen if 'on his day' is a thing of the past for Carragher now.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Sthelens RLFC wrote:Reina, Johnson, Agger, Mascherano, Gerrard and Torres would get into Arsenal's XI.
Possibly right with Reina, I didn't really think of keepers as it's not really Liverpool's problem. Although being better than Almunia is hardly a glowing reference IMO.
Johnson and Sagna have little between them, both good in posession and suspect without. See above re Agger/Vermaelen, and Mascherano is very much the proverbial water carrier, I don't see what all the fuss is about. I certainly don't think he'd keep Fabregas out, assuming Gerrard is the other CM.
Joined: Mar 07 2007 Posts: 7121 Location: Warrington
carl_spackler wrote:Possibly right with Reina, I didn't really think of keepers as it's not really Liverpool's problem. Although being better than Almunia is hardly a glowing reference IMO.
Johnson and Sagna have little between them, both good in posession and suspect without. See above re Agger/Vermaelen, and Mascherano is very much the proverbial water carrier, I don't see what all the fuss is about. I certainly don't think he'd keep Fabregas out, assuming Gerrard is the other CM.
Arsenal play three midfielders. Masch is better than Song and Denilson who are both first choice regulars at Arsenal. With regards to Sagna and Johnson, they're kind of players who are opposites in ways. Sagna is solid defensively, quick and decent enough in possession, whilst johnson is terrific going forward but is lacking the brains defensively at times.
Joined: Feb 20 2007 Posts: 10540 Location: Hunting Gopher
Robbie Rotten wrote:Arsenal play three midfielders. Masch is better than Song and Denilson who are both first choice regulars at Arsenal. With regards to Sagna and Johnson, they're kind of players who are opposites in ways. Sagna is solid defensively, quick and decent enough in possession, whilst johnson is terrific going forward but is lacking the brains defensively at times.
I suppose it's just a different approach to the question. In Arsenal's current system, yes he'd probably get in the midfield 3. I was considering it as how many Liverpool players would get in as a whole, and for me that would mean a 4-4-2, as I don't see how you could leave out one of Torres or Van Persie.
I still think Sagna has some defensive issues as well TBH, dives in and commits himself a bit too quick at times IMO.
Joined: Mar 07 2007 Posts: 7121 Location: Warrington
carl_spackler wrote:I suppose it's just a different approach to the question. In Arsenal's current system, yes he'd probably get in the midfield 3. I was considering it as how many Liverpool players would get in as a whole, and for me that would mean a 4-4-2, as I don't see how you could leave out one of Torres or Van Persie.
I still think Sagna has some defensive issues as well TBH, dives in and commits himself a bit too quick at times IMO.
I'd play a kind of 4-2-3-1 but it isn't quite the same as Liverpool's. Masch would hold the midfield whilst Cesc would be a kind of box-to-box playmaker, with Gerrard playing just off Torres with RVP to the right and Arshavin to the left. Before this season, I'd have had Skrtel over most defenders in the league, I rated him so highly but this year he has been utterly woeful, he seems to have lost all composure, aggression and brains and ended up looking very poor. Vermaelen looks good but I still think a fit Daniel Agger is the superior player.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum