http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=619

http://www.hullkr.co.uk/article.php?id=619

Good news. Plenty of sponsors in the current climate.

Further good news.

I'm sure i read somehere on a forum earlier this month that Parasol had gone bust and ditched Rovers......but then again i read.

1) Rovers were not going to get the East stand extended.

2) Rovers were signing Graham Horne / Tommy Lee / Paul King.

3) Rovers could not afford any marquee signings from Oz.

4) Rovers were the only team in the city to prune staff ( or coaches ).

etc, etc

Some prety bad trolling by the usual suspects but the main concern is that a lot of the "not so bright" actually believe these muppets

I read somewhere that having a single sponser on a shirt was the way to go as it promoted a clean, classic look. etc ect etc

Like thats soooo last year

The clean classic look was last year. It's so passe.

that was in the same press release as the Burj el a Salt End wasnt it



Parasol must have had some spare dosh left after there other big sponsorhip deal i guess

Still prefer a shirt with only one sponsor though, rather than a patch-work quilt (or with funeral colours on!).

I prefer a shirt that maximises revenue for the club.