Nobeerineasthull wrote:So how does NH know that its one of the best deals in Super League? I would have thought that all clubs (and sponsors) would want to keep the actual sums fairly close to their chests.

Roofs wrote:Oh right, nightmare, sorry to hear that. Hope she didn't rub it in by constantly telling you how awesome it was (that's what people usually do with me ).

Tell your hubby you'll remember next time he wants company for a gig. :twisted:

Big Dave T wrote:Ah ok, just you sounded like you'd heard something.



With you saying you believed the parasol deal was more than Lloyds and the new sponsorship is the biggest in history i thought you may have overheard a financial conversation in a boozer or something?

Wouldnt surprise me if it was the biggest in rovers histroy. Finishing 4th in SL should have that effect and the sponsor has managed any risk by it been a 1 year deal.

roversmad wrote:Finally admitted it then

Captain Dave wrote:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/leisure/article6932436.ece

article from The Times on our new sponsor.

Jake the Peg wrote:I know all clubs have to maximise income but I wouldn't be happy if my kids' rugby heroes were running around advertising gambling. I'd definitely not buy them shirts with a gambling website emblazoned across the front

Jake the Peg wrote:I know all clubs have to maximise income but I wouldn't be happy if my kids' rugby heroes were running around advertising gambling.

Jake the Peg wrote:I'd definitely not buy them shirts with a gambling website emblazoned across the front

pmh wrote:Oh quellé suprise.