Chris1953 wrote:With half term ending tonight zod is probably tucked up in bed but yes I did start the post as banter also if he cares to look I also started a post saying s briscoe was a good selection at full back!!
I started a thread on virtual terrace and the majority of posters (not all) agreed tom had been hung out to dry. These were neither rovers or hull fans.
Also the BBC commentators said briscoe was left out to dry.
So as valued as your opinion is you do appear to be in the minority and possibly dare I say it??? Wrong !!
Night zoddy and don't forget to take your homework tomorrow x
Nope.
For example...
Hull FC play Wire the first game of 2008 so I give a breakdown post of why Hull FC had no chance of finishing in the play-offs. I was in the minority then yet I was eventually proved 100% correct. If I was as sad as Mrs B then I could be @rsed to dig it up for you.
And...
I think I was the only member of this forum (FC or Rovers) who thought FC would not finish in the play-offs before the season started yet I was proved 100% correct.
I've learned more in the last 4 years watching Rovers under Justin Morgan than the previous 20 watching under other coaches and feel closer to the game than I've ever been - hence why I've been so accurate in terms of my predictions above.
Infact, a mate of mine at work regularly asks me for betting tips and thinks nothing of shelling out £100 on the tips I give him - most of which prove to be right.
Although Rovers have the SL Dream Team second-rowers, the secret of our success has been our back three: Briscoe / Fox / Colbon kick returns which have enabled us to do so well.
I've got nothing personal against Tom Briscoe and he wasn't "to blame" for the tries as such as it's been well documented about who was inside him, but he was merely a pedestrian without the athletic ability to have any effect on the game - time to play a winger who has the ability to affect a game.
