Mrs Barista wrote:Very good and fair post. Over the last 24 hours the "discussion" has been turned into a witch hunt aginst Briscoe on here and the VT by your learned friend, with the statements about Briscoe's weaknesses and Fox's strengths being exaggerated 10-fold. Fox will do well to live up to this billing, good player though he is.
From being a witch hunt against Fox you mean by the original poster?
I wish Briscoe well like all the young players coming through the ranks, I just don't think he's good enough as an athlete to international RL.
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
General Zod. wrote:you really are a sad low-life...
Fortunately not tragic enough to resort to personal insults, however. Read the AUP. You wouldn't want to risk being unable to post 100+ times in 24 hours about the international inadequacies of a 19-year-old, would you?
Joined: Nov 13 2005 Posts: 1328 Location: west hull
General Zod. wrote:Not capable of providing an counter debate I see. Hardly surprising considering you thought your team would finish 3rd back in 2008.
How sad are you?? feel quite sorry for you, if all you can do is knock a poor kid on his debut against the best team in the world, i can only imagine your delight as you was sat watching Tom, marking him down, eagerly awaiting your chance to open up a thread on how dire he is??? ha ha ha your such a silly person, how did you think your own Briscoe do? to me he looked like what he is......... a second rate Radlinski, bring on the Fox against the kiwis, see how good he really is!!!!
Joined: Feb 11 2008 Posts: 1087 Location: east of east hull
i think you'll find it was'nt his debut, and by the last tournement, the kiwi's are the best. silly boy.
east hull fc fan wrote: 1 major trophy in 18 years doesn't make us a big club. On the pitch is were it counts and by that theory were no bigger than Sheffield! tarquin fuego wrote: I wrote this 2 mins before the game finished , you know why Sheldon Maylord ? because I know about RL ! Hoss pot HOW on earth do you get NILLED at Wembley ? When your coach isn't a winner at heart and Gentle is not a winner at heart . We were a pub team I coached for a long time and we won 95% of games because winning is a mental state driven by a desire to CRUSH an opposition. Did FC look as though they wanted to Crush Wigan and strangle them until they screamed ? NO RL is a tough tough game and Maylord She-dong you have no clue In fact don't ever ever reply to any of my posts again
Joined: Sep 23 2006 Posts: 8033 Location: sea level once again
westjba wrote:How sad are you?? feel quite sorry for you, if all you can do is knock a poor kid on his debut against the best team in the world, i can only imagine your delight as you was sat watching Tom, marking him down, eagerly awaiting your chance to open up a thread on how dire he is??? ha ha ha your such a silly person, how did you think your own Briscoe do? to me he looked like what he is......... a second rate Radlinski, bring on the Fox against the kiwis, see how good he really is!!!!
Irony alert! FWIW I thought Shaun had a pretty decent game.
Wildmoose wrote:Imagine if Briscoe becomes the player he could be, is picked in the dream team on merit & is easily one of the best 2 English wingers (or probably centres) in the comp for 2 seasons. Would you then expect him to be playing for England, or overlooked for a youngster who shows potential?
Briscoe did nothing wrong yesterday, the game just passed him by. Poor lad. Hope his confidence doesn’t get knocked by this.
I reckon Fox would probably have caught Inglis, but catching him & bringing him down isn’t the same thing…& they’d probably have scored on the next play anyway.
Yeah, Fox can make mistakes, but he’s a threat every time he carries the ball & kicking to him in broken play is always a risk. Young Briscoe is more solid but just doesn’t carry the same threat…not yet anyway. His time will come. He doesn’t deserve to be dropped on yesterdays performance, but Fox has earned his chance over the last 2 seasons & IMO should be given a go.
As for the rest of the game Smith & McGuire seem to be taking most of the flack here, but weren’t they left as badly exposed as poor Briscoe? Who would have done better?
Every time the Aussies poured through our right centre they had more runners than we had defenders. Did anybody notice any covering forwards?
This is the problem with playing props in the back-row. If you sacrifice mobility for power you’ll always be vulnerable to a quick shift of the ball…& who does this better than Thurston & Lockyer?
If we get to play them again we need to be more mobile.
Briscoe got caught out because of the ineptitude of a coach playing someone who's off to Rugby Yawnion . Smith's defence is shocking and was cruelly exposed in the World Cup and the game over the weekend. Gave Inglis far too much respect and room . Briscoe has been unfortunate to have such a crap centre playing for England.
Joined: Nov 13 2005 Posts: 1328 Location: west hull
red al wrote:i think you'll find it was'nt his debut, and by the last tournement, the kiwi's are the best. silly boy.
yeah yeah, worded completely wrong, i meant his first against Australia, you'v got to admit your man ZZZZZod is a bore, im not a troll, and wouldnt post on a board for the sake of it, he just needs to realise how silly he looks!! and for what its worth, Sean Briscoe, didnt deserve my comment!!!!!
And Australia are the best in the world!!!
Users browsing this forum: JACK DETH and 47 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
