Wonder how long it took his first RL coach to convince the village idiot Fox that a high kick was simply a rugby ball and not aliens from another planet in an oval space ship?

Maybe he didn't see the 2000 WC team, as he states it's the worst he's seen.

I wont mention the 1999 squad that went down under then....

stop posting on rlfans and deliver my post

Your fellow kr fans must be cringing at that statement, i know lots of kr fans and they all feel he would have been a week link against the aussies, yes he has a fast scoot, but you have to ask why he gets the ball kicked to him a lot more than Briscoe does

sorry but that was funny no matter who it was aimed at

Briscoe is now the weak link as he is now the most inexperienced back in the team and the Aussie's will target him .No Hull v Rovers bias this is a fact and if our pack don't get on top of the Aussie's and try to keep the game in the middle of the park he will have a torrid day as will all the backs.
by the way i only remember one high ball going to Bricsoe against France and he dropped it every back does not just fox

Does inexperience mean the weakest link? I agree with your point about the pack getting on top but i think the likes of Shenton and Lee Smith are under as much pressure as Tom Briscoe is. Ryan Hall as an inexperienced too. Tom's level headed attitude will do him just fine i think. I do fear for us though against their backs in general.

Been the most inexperienced does not automatically make him the weak link. Shenton, Hall, Eastmond and Tomkins have never played against the Ozzies either.

FWIW Briscoe has played at Wembley so might have more big game experience then say Shenton.

Either way tomorrows game will be a different level for a lot of the younger English lads.