I personally think Smith shouldn't be in the team as he is moving to union.... But as he is do you think his attacking ability outweighs Briscoes solid defence??
For once I'm going to have to put club to one side and say against the Australians a solid last line of defence gets it so it's Briscoe for me

Against the Aussies and Kiwis we're going to need Briscoe at FB, but no offence to Tom Briscoe; if we want to to the best available side out, I'd have smith on the wing. But as usual we're struggling for centres.

Judging by Saturdays game, it could be a busy night for Briscoe.

Eastmond didnt have a bad spell so id keep it how it was at fullback personally.

For me Briscoe is one of the bravest players of the game, his defence & positional play are both solid. I think we are going to need someone who is not afraid of taking a few knocks or being "ruffed up abit".

Briscoe for me.

Briscoe, we are going to get beat anyway, but Eastmond at full back would be suicide.

Id play T. Briscoe and Eastmond in the centres. S. Briscoe at full back and smith and hall on the wings. Not the biggest set of backs in the world (hall aside) but RL is not just about size.

correct but the Aussie backs would walk over ours at the moment, i think - not just the size of them - but they have the same pace our backs have aswell.

yeh, tbf, it doesn't really matter who we pick.............