El Pac Carnegie wrote:And you know he didn't notice it how? I'm amazed anybody can find Cadle professional. The guy bumbles through everything, it's rare when he actually gets a link fluently right. Coombs isn't brilliant but i'd rather have someone other enthusiastic than barely interested at all.
I don't know whether he noticed it or not. However a hell of a lot of the time he says, oh well i saw what whoever saw also. It just gets annoying him constantly repeating everything and seeing the same replay with him talking as we just saw with the American commentators talking.
Coombs, i have no problem with his enthusiasm, but he is always moving his hands, which is quite annoying, and he gets players names/teams/previous team played for wrong a number of times. Do some research Coombs!
El Pac Carnegie wrote:As for your problem with Carlson i really don't get that one at all. He breaks it down brilliantly and helps people like myself pick up the strategy of the defence easily. You need to remember we aren't all supergenius' like yourself
I'm not a supergenuis. I know plently about the game and the different strategies though, and Carlson does break it down pretty well. However as a broadcaster surely it is his job to promote the game? He spent an entire broadcast saying how bad the Packers and Lions were, how bad the NFC North is, how bad the game was, how bad the referees were etc. He finds things like calling Atari Bigby "video game" or something like that hilarious and spent about 5 minutes talking and laughing about it.
His breaking down of plays is decent and his pre-game key things are decent also, if a little obvious, but i just don't find him professional enough.