Red Preacher wrote:Aboriginal art work is hardly graffiti.
I didn't mean that in a derogatory way. I like Aboriginal art, that's why I posted the item in the first place! I was drawing a comparison between indiginous art forms, and making a cheap gag that art indiginous to Salford is graffiti. Swap graffiti then with a Lowry print – would we all be happy with Salford playing in a Lowry print shirt next year?
Red Preacher wrote:As for asthetics, well, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Maybe this is another difference between the brits and their antipodean cousins. It seems to me that a major character trait of the British is to be quite closed to anything a bit out-there, a bit different and not the norm. The Aussies tend to avoid getting upset over most things and I'm sure thats what the good folk of Newcastle were like when this jersey got released. Kinda "yeah, cool, whatever."
I disagree. Some Aussie clubs sell supporters shirts — which sport a club's traditional colours and colour forms — as well as replica jerseys, which must tell you something. Why, also, did the Australian national jersey revert back to traditional type after a few stray design years in the 90s?
Your club's jersey shouldn't be a fashion statement, it represents the team and its supporters. Sports most successful clubs and franchises recognise this. Check what most of the top Premier League football clubs and the England national team have done recently.