ST_CONROY wrote:You clearly can't read. I've posted this two pages back.
I was wrong about the Broncos, they are a legitimate good team.
However you evidently don't know what deception means.
So if you'd actually answer the question. For us to have a decieving record of 3-2 that means you must think we should be either 5-0 or 0-5. SO ARE WE DECEPTIVELY GOOD OR DECEPTIVELY BAD?
We are hardly deceptive if we are the epitomy of middle of the road, ranked around sixteen in most power rankings, not far above 500. Again, does that mean you think we should be top or bottom?
We only lost by one TD to each team. I expect us to get to around 9 or 10 wins. Hardly 16-0 is it.
and again, the point your arguing against you used yourself with the comment below, implying Denver's record is decieving as they hadnt played any good teams and saying youd wait till they were 6-0 till giving them credit...which is what im saying.
Plus they have hardly beaten anybody worthwile
Cincy, they defeated on a complete fluke play.
Cleveland are atrocious. This years Detroit. I honestly think i could assmeble a team capable of beating them.
Oakland. Well Oakland are Oakland. Overall poor, especially on offence.
If they win the next three weeks and are 6-0 i'll re-asses my opinion.
