Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
Mrs Barista wrote:2 year deal was a "mistake" by Morgan that has been "rectified" according to GML.
All clubs sign 'mistakes', but at the time he was an improvement for us, now he is not good enough. I think Mills and Fisher are on too long a deal, its preventing us bringing in better.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
Mrs Barista wrote:2 year deal was a "mistake" by Morgan that has been "rectified" according to GML.
Mills was rewarded with a 2 year deal on the back of playing every league and cup game for us in 2008. Some record for a prop and the contract was well deserved.
However, since been rewarded with the contract his form has gone backwards at a rate that must even impress Chris Thorman.
R.B.A wrote:Mills was rewarded with a 2 year deal on the back of playing every league and cup game for us in 2008. Some record for a prop and the contract was well deserved. However, since been rewarded with the contract his form has gone backwards at a rate that must even impress Chris Thorman.
Graeme Horne very rarely misses any games with injury....
Surely good form should have been the preferred indicator?
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
rover49 wrote:All clubs sign 'mistakes', but at the time he was an improvement for us, now he is not good enough. I think Mills and Fisher are on too long a deal, its preventing us bringing in better.
GML was hinting that it wasn't though, as the mistake had been "rectified", perhaps implying he's been paid out?
Joined: Jun 01 2007 Posts: 12668 Location: Leicestershire.
Mrs Barista wrote:GML was hinting that it wasn't though, as the mistake had been "rectified", perhaps implying he's been paid out?
He said 'rectifies' iirc. Changing the tense removes the possibility that he meant simply, that IHO, it'll be rectified passively - that is the mistake won't be repeated/compounded. Whichever he meant, I guess he'd be happy to leave it ambiguous - to avoid being wrong or it being a leak. If I didn't know better I'd say that you are, very elegantly, trying to make mischieve (sp?).
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Mild Rover wrote:He said 'rectifies' iirc. Changing the tense removes the possibility that he meant simply, that IHO, it'll be rectified passively - that is the mistake won't be repeated/compounded. Whichever he meant, I guess he'd be happy to leave it ambiguous - to avoid being wrong or it being a leak. If I didn't know better I'd say that you are, very elegantly, trying to make mischieve (sp?).
Why thank you, sir.
He said of Morgan "He does make mistakes like Mills getting 2 years but then he rectifies them." So if the mistake was a 2 year deal, and he's completed one year, how would the mistake become rectified unless he's shipped out?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
