colt-45 wrote:What a mindless piece of work you really are! your a credit to the HKR SUPPORTERS!
HOW CAN YOU NOT JUDGE A SEASONS PERFORMANCE WITHOUT EQUATING THE PROPORTIONATE NUMBER OF INJURED PLAYERS ! To not have a full squad for a majority of a season however, (you address it as you want) has to have a baring on your overall seasons performance,I would like to see how rovers would cope with upto 9 first team players not at your dissposal for a "majority" of the season.
Who rattled your cage?... with a signature such as yours you deserve what you get on the HKR Forum!
If you worked in a restaurant you'd be a dumb waiter
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
Mild Rover wrote:Hull FC's injury problems have been a significant factor in their very poor form over the last 2 seasons. Not the only factor, but a significant one. In 2008 I think Rovers fans jumped on it as an excuse, believeing Hull fans were reluctant to admit HKR were capable of finishing above HFC under equal and normal circumstances. There may have been a element of that, but in fairness fans want to believe and it was just 1 bad year after several decent ones. This year Hull fans have realized that injuries are a part of it, but that the problems ran deeper and have often acknowledged that. Some Rovers fans feel that 2 years of the same complaint gets a bit tired, but IMO that is harsh - they've had a really bad run. They've admitted they were poop, so we should admit that.
I am sure we all hope there are fewer injuries to talk about next year. I for one am sick of them whining on about it (joke!).
In terms of numbers, probably about the same number missing both years (6 through injury every week, plus Crocker and Lauaki who never turned up). The reason we can't claim injuries as the sole reason for our shocking results is Agar. His job was to get the maximum out of what he had available, depleted though it may have been. He didn't. Which makes me think next season will not be much better, despite the overall improvement in the squad.
Joined: Aug 31 2005 Posts: 8546 Location: Location Location
FC Wembley 08 wrote:Saying good things about FC and FC fans can only result in one thing...........You being banned from the HKR forum. But, more importantly, if you keep talking sense with rational thought you will be banned from the full RLFans website Stop it immediately
You'd never guess he is one of my childhood friends would you!
Joined: Mar 05 2007 Posts: 13190 Location: Hedon (sometimes), sometimes Premier Inn's
fcimp wrote:Easy to say when your club has had hardly any though isn't it? If they took 6 players at random out of your team every week of the season you wouldn't be as quick to make such a statement.
'when my life is over, the thing which will have given me greatest pride is that I was first to plunge into the sea, swimming freely underwater without any connection to the terrestrial world'
rover49 wrote:Hudgell said about half way that there was 'some' money in the pot should we need to bring someone in, so I suppose we were not.
cheers mate.
the big problem getting ozzies over here now is the interest rate.
last year it was .40 now its .54!
so a year ago you could offer a player 100,000 pounds and they'd get $250,000
now you offer them 100,000 pounds and they get $185185.
thats a massive reduction especially when you consider the big players (smith, inglis) are reportedly on $500,000 and players like lockyer and folau are on $400,000.
so Lockyer would need 216,000 pounds just to be on the same wage were as last year he'd have only needed 160,000 pounds.
Tarquin Fuego wrote: I love Jamie and have done since he was 10 years old.
The Reason wrote:Hi Andy
The Rugby Football League are in the process of reviewing the video that you are referring to. We do not condone behaviour of this nature and have contacted the player’s employer, Hull F.C., who have confirmed that they are dealing with the incident under their club rules.
Mild Rover wrote:Hull FC's injury problems have been a significant factor in their very poor form over the last 2 seasons. Not the only factor, but a significant one. In 2008 I think Rovers fans jumped on it as an excuse, believeing Hull fans were reluctant to admit HKR were capable of finishing above HFC under equal and normal circumstances. There may have been a element of that, but in fairness fans want to believe and it was just 1 bad year after several decent ones. This year Hull fans have realized that injuries are a part of it, but that the problems ran deeper and have often acknowledged that. Some Rovers fans feel that 2 years of the same complaint gets a bit tired, but IMO that is harsh - they've had a really bad run. They've admitted they were poop, so we should admit that.
I am sure we all hope there are fewer injuries to talk about next year. I for one am sick of them whining on about it (joke!).
Good post, I think even the most red tinted glasses wearer would see that FC's injuries have had an impact on there season. Where I think the arguement falls down a bit is with the complaint of not having a consistant run of a half back pairing. As far as I'm aware they had a reasonably injury free run at 6 and 7 this year (Horne got an inury late in the season I think). The fact they recruited an extremely poor No7 is the a major contributing factor they performed poorly last year.
Add that to the recruitment for next year a 34 (i think) year old No7 and I think they can expect him to miss 5+ games this season and more next. Similar with Fitzgibbon, I would expect him to have a spell on the sidelines through injury, purley on an age factor. So IF this happens then its no longer bad luck, merely recruitment of players that you can expect a level of injury from.
barham red wrote:Good post, I think even the most red tinted glasses wearer would see that FC's injuries have had an impact on there season. Where I think the arguement falls down a bit is with the complaint of not having a consistant run of a half back pairing. As far as I'm aware they had a reasonably injury free run at 6 and 7 this year (Horne got an inury late in the season I think). The fact they recruited an extremely poor No7 is the a major contributing factor they performed poorly last year.
Add that to the recruitment for next year a 34 (i think) year old No7 and I think they can expect him to miss 5+ games this season and more next. Similar with Fitzgibbon, I would expect him to have a spell on the sidelines through injury, purley on an age factor. So IF this happens then its no longer bad luck, merely recruitment of players that you can expect a level of injury from.
Mildl & yourself can make this board so boring some-times Your not suppose to talk any sense, if Cheeky was stil here there would be hell to pay
Most teams suffer injuries during a season but most teams don't constanty go on and on and on and on about them.
DANNY LOCKWOOD - LEAGUE WEEKLY (18-5-09)
I'M SURE THERE IS NO CORRELATION BETWEEN THE FACT THAT THE FRONT RUNNERS FOR THE 2009 MEDIA WHINGING AWARD ARE FROM GATESHEAD AND HULL FC, FORMERLY THE B*ST*RD-TWINS OF ONE OF RUGBY LEAGUE'S LOUSIER IDEAS.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Stop it immediately 
