So Galea lost his house in Aus which he more then likely has rent coming in for because he was late on 1 payment.

As i said, back on topic.

never said he lost his house, what i said was he could have if he hadnt been paid..anywyas back on topic, mounis decent signing if true...but where would he play 2nd row or loose man??

Loose, with Scotty sharing hooker with Fisher.

He could play both I believe - though perhaps not simultaneously. That way it could be a kick in the teeth to both Scott Murrell and Scott Taylor.

That would be a terrible kick in the teeth for young Hodgson though wouldn't it? And with Spaven still picking his premolars off the floor it could be protein shakes all round in 2010.

Not really, do you HONESTLY believe Hodgson will be first or second choice hooker in 2010. He is one for the future.

It was a TIC jibe at a standard trolling technique that often greets our new signings. Having more than one player for any given position creates tension rather competition, apparently.

Tbf there is a thread on their board worrying about fitting all their forwards into one team, so perhaps they are not all trolls and some are genuinely stupid.

Back on topic i think Mounis would be an incredibly good signing and if true would provide further proof that Murrell is seen as a hooker, a position he excelled in at Acadamy level and a position i think he'd excel in at SL level as well.

Now thats an offer you can't refuse
Don't you have to clear it with Kev first though?

Hodgson is to be 2nd choice hooker for next year