[quote="good hair"]would you be happy if a player on the opposite side tried to do to you what stan did then?[/quote]

i'd probably react the same (no mention of throwing a punch at redhall) bit it wasn't a fecking gouge. naughty fair enough but a gouge is way off the mark. Its not tiddly winks

its a lack of respect for his opposition, an act of a coward for all to see

Yes,yes.yes.... finsished yer' rant?

Stan got a fine for a facial!
Not for a gouge which you have gotten into your head.
If it was a gouge it would be season and possibly career over for Stan.
Acceptable-No.
Part of the game at a lower level-Unfortuanly Yes.
Refs at the lower end of the game are a law unto themselves sometimes.
Cushy god rest his soul made up rules so he could have a rest towards the end, He died as he would have wanted though on the pitch I belive.

its not a rant, its a forum to discuss rugby if i remember correctly and thats what im doingam i not?

[quote="good hair"]its a lack of respect for his opposition, an act of a coward for all to see[/quote]

i agree with that but it wasn't a fecking twitting b'starding gouge. just admit it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

end of thread then, nothing more to discuss then... should say in the rules and regs- no one and i mean no one dare say a bad word against stan ever.

it wasnt a gouge, it was an attempt at a gouge from what i saw.

not cos its stan, he shouldnt have done what he did [b]BUT IT WASNT A GOUGE [/b] WHAT PART OF THAT DONT YOU GET. ITS NOT STAN, THE RULES OR ANYTHING ELSE. HE PICKED HIS NOSE A BIT ROUGH YOU IDIOT. [b]NO GOUGE[/b]

The RFL disagree with you