For once I beat you to it

No, it's really not plain for everyone to see, otherwise there would be no confusion.

There have been videos on Youtube focusing in on that left hand ball to show this, yet there is very little that can be seen, and the ball rising by a mm could have perhaps been caused by a draught, or the ping pong ball rolling forward or backwards slightly.

that ball rising looks like it's done just because there's nay room in that tray, being squozen(not a word) up slightly.

Those balls were sitting in that rack as tight as balls in a jock strap

Blown by wind indeed!!!!!!!!!!

So what exactly was plain for all to see. One of the balls raises by about a mm?

Why didn't the others move?

Is it not possible it rolled forward or backwards a mm?

Its raised up not leaning forward or backwards.

Not properly put in place by the assistant. Derren will be fuming

After watching the youtube videos which 'prove' this theory, I am pretty sure that they 'prove' nothing, and it certainly isn't plain for all to see, as you say.

I don't doubt there was some trickery, but to state it is plain for all to see, is well, just wrong. Otherwise we could all just nip to Youtube and see the proof and put this to bed, but tbh the videos are rubbish.

Then you stick with what you believe and I will stick with the truth

Just to quash one theory out of extinction. Some people think that the fact the camera was shaking is a sign the whole thing was faked etc. I defy anyone to film a piece of footage hand held (like the cameraman was as we saw on Wednesday) and not make the video shake. Its almost impossible for anyone to hold a piece of equipment like that and there not be some sort of movement. If you don't believe me, look at when Bill Arthur is interviewing a coach or man of the match at the end of a Sky game and you will see the same thing occur.

oi!

WOTT is gonna be vexed you've robbed his specialist subject now.