RyanWire wrote:what about maybe the numbers being projected onto the balls after they are known?
He said he had spent the past 12 months of his life trying to figure out a way to do it though so I doubt it's as simple as projecting numbers onto balls. Also can't see channel 4 giving 1hr of their time up on a friday night to explain how they managed to beam some numbers onto a couple of balls
Will be interesting to see how he did actually do it.
Joined: Dec 07 2006 Posts: 1983 Location: Just turning your corner now
W.F wrote:He said he had spent the past 12 months of his life trying to figure out a way to do it though so I doubt it's as simple as projecting numbers onto balls. Also can't see channel 4 giving 1hr of their time up on a friday night to explain how they managed to beam some numbers onto a couple of balls
Will be interesting to see how he did actually do it.
W.F wrote:He said he had spent the past 12 months of his life trying to figure out a way to do it though so I doubt it's as simple as projecting numbers onto balls. Also can't see channel 4 giving 1hr of their time up on a friday night to explain how they managed to beam some numbers onto a couple of balls
Will be interesting to see how he did actually do it.
They Showed 'on tour with the Queen' which was a weekly series
Joined: Aug 29 2007 Posts: 4224 Location: Warrington and Hollywood
Cubby wrote:I thought he was a class player, he had a great kicking and passing game for a second row, he filled in at 6 time and time again for Salford as well.
W.F wrote:He said he had spent the past 12 months of his life trying to figure out a way to do it though so I doubt it's as simple as projecting numbers onto balls. Also can't see channel 4 giving 1hr of their time up on a friday night to explain how they managed to beam some numbers onto a couple of balls
.
I think that quote was a part of the act.
I also cant see channel 4 giving up an hour to say it was a split screen either It will be incredibly simple, it always is.
It's all to do with the amount of times certain balls have and haven't been drawn and the laws of probability that dictate which should be drawn. He's probably got a team who have done research on every single lottery draw and then worked out patterns and such-like and they have come up with 5 numbers that should be drawn in accordance with the laws of probability.
Or, so I've been told.
We're the first ones to starve, we're the first ones to die The first ones in line for that pie-in-the-sky And we're always the last when the cream is shared out For the worker is working when the fat cat's about
Joined: Jun 03 2009 Posts: 791 Location: Warrington
'Hitman' Norvern Soul wrote:It's all to do with the amount of times certain balls have and haven't been drawn and the laws of probability that dictate which should be drawn. He's probably got a team who have done research on every single lottery draw and then worked out patterns and such-like and they have come up with 5 numbers that should be drawn in accordance with the laws of probability.
Or, so I've been told.
lol no way, the odds don't change on what numbers could come out, it's just 49/1 per ball and that's it
Joined: Feb 22 2007 Posts: 3414 Location: Doha, Qatar - Home of the 2022 World Cup and now relocated to the M62 corridor
Derren Brown to predict Wire for 2010 GF win......
Fat blokes in the mud, flat caps, bogs that drain pi55 directly onto your boots - Now it's all 'Big Ask', 'Arm Wrestle', 'Collision' 'Contact' 'Facials' 'Upper Body Strength' 'Big Units' 'Scooting from Dummy Half' 'Energy Levels' 'Laying the Platform' ‘Middles’ and 'T-R-Y'. Let’s not forget resilience.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Challenge Cup Winners 2009 and 2010 
