Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
General Zod. wrote:Any yes or no option indicates the latter.
Anyway, of the 2 options, would do you consider to be the priority?
Winning trophies obviously. The question here is whether Cook, Matu and Hodgson are pivotal to Rovers winning silverware in the next couple of years and it sounds like you're confident they are, so good for you.
Mrs Barista wrote:Winning trophies obviously. The question here is whether Cook, Matu and Hodgson are pivotal to Rovers winning silverware in the next couple of years and it sounds like you're confident they are, so good for you.
Err no, I wouldn't say they are going to be pivotal but who knows.
Anyway, WTF is "Matu" - a Japanese international or someone?
Joined: May 09 2009 Posts: 1113 Location: East Hull
Concern yourself why your club are bickering over "Fat Sam" and his salary, he is in talks with a couple of other teams who want him, Gateshull need to act fast, i think you will sign him , but why do your club try to do everything on the cheap
Joined: Jul 15 2005 Posts: 29811 Location: West Yorkshire
cheeky charlie wrote:Concern yourself why your club are bickering over "Fat Sam" and his salary, he is in talks with a couple of other teams who want him, Gateshull need to act fast, i think you will sign him , but why do your club try to do everything on the cheap
What other reason could there be for us not signing Moa up at this point?
Joined: May 09 2009 Posts: 1113 Location: East Hull
Mrs Barista wrote:What other reason could there be for us not signing Moa up at this point?
Two clubs want him apart from you, however i believe your club are whinging on the money side of things again , but they will sign him, after leaving you lot in a will they wont they scenario, then when they finally "release" they have signed "Fat Sam", you will flick the bean, and the rest will crack one off, when all along its rubbish , its the spin doctor Rule mugging you off again , classic !! ,and you fall for it all the time
Joined: Apr 17 2005 Posts: 3469 Location: With Hull's only grade "A" SL club.
cheeky charlie wrote:Two clubs want him apart from you, however i believe your club are whinging on the money side of things again , but they will sign him, after leaving you lot in a will they wont they scenario, then when they finally "release" they have signed "Fat Sam", you will flick the bean, and the rest will crack one off, when all along its rubbish , its the spin doctor Rule mugging you off again , classic !! ,and you fall for it all the time
Think you'll find it's the quota spot that is the sticking point. All will be revealed soon.
Joined: Mar 22 2009 Posts: 2397 Location: East Hull
General Zod. wrote:What do you think is the main priority;
1) Providing local young players a contract
or
2) Winning trophies.
No elaborations please - a simple yes or no will do.
Winning Trophies... our youngsters arnt good enough yet - its a simple fact. it takes longer then 3years of SL to get the youngsters coming in at SL standards in my book.
Users browsing this forum: AgbriggAmbler and 265 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
, but they will sign him, after leaving you lot in a will they wont they scenario, then when they finally "release" they have signed "Fat Sam", you will flick the bean, and the rest will crack one off, when all along its rubbish , its the spin doctor Rule mugging you off again , classic !! ,and you fall for it all the time 
