Joined: May 09 2009 Posts: 1113 Location: East Hull
Gateshull fans amuse me, our Chairman wipes the floor with their chairman/person/woman, very acute businessman, and the mind games he taunts them with are class, nearly as good as me .
What also amuses me is how they are in her in their droves when a ROVERS issue is been discussed....however if we dare to go on their forum its a sure banning coming your way !!! if you upset them. bring on tommorow night when Wigan beat them watch them retreat for a while pathetic merged muppets , great achivement above Salford & Celtic
Digger_the_Dog wrote:That is irrelevent mate, the fact is Adam Pearson is a business man and wanted all 3 in there meaning more profit for the SMC through bars and events.
Why would he choose to offer a very poorly supported club at the time the stadium but not Hull who have always had a pretty good fan base and were far better on the field at the time.
Just because most HKR fans live in a world that started in Super League the fact is when the stadium was built HKR were tosh and the suggestion Adam Pearson would offer them exclusive use over Hull is laughable.
You talk some sense there however I was under the impression it was Hull City Council who offered the KC to all three clubs. Bearing in mind that Hull Super League have to pay 50% of the gate money to the SMC over a gate of 7.5 k then who's laughing now ?
Joined: May 09 2009 Posts: 1113 Location: East Hull
cofr_rockin_robin wrote:You talk some sense there however I was under the impression it was Hull City Council who offered the KC to all three clubs. Bearing in mind that Hull Super League have to pay 50% of the gate money to the SMC over a gate of 7.5 k then who's laughing now ?
Meaning Gateshull lost a shed load of cash with their freebies giveaway at the Quins game ( as exposed by Cheekie Charlie on James Rule KCFM show ), no doubt the same will occur with the Bulls game , come on Bitter Barista do explain.you love finances
cofr_rockin_robin wrote:You talk some sense there however I was under the impression it was Hull City Council who offered the KC to all three clubs. Bearing in mind that Hull Super League have to pay 50% of the gate money to the SMC over a gate of 7.5 k then who's laughing now ?
the fee we pay is offset by paying nothing for stewarding, ticket office staff or maintenance and repairs.
also if fell on hard times (such as losing our franchise/being relegated) we'd be playing in a top ground for next to nothing.
Joined: Sep 01 2005 Posts: 4033 Location: the peoples republic of West Hull
cheeky charlie wrote:Meaning Gateshull lost a shed load of cash with their freebies giveaway at the Quins game ( as exposed by Cheekie Charlie on James Rule KCFM show ), no doubt the same will occur with the Bulls game , come on Bitter Barista do explain.you love finances
The club didn't lose any cash from the free tickets... the foundation covered the costs. this was part of the HDM "bounce back " campaign.
cheeky charlie wrote:Meaning Gateshull lost a shed load of cash with their freebies giveaway at the Quins game ( as exposed by Cheekie Charlie on James Rule KCFM show ), no doubt the same will occur with the Bulls game , come on Bitter Barista do explain.you love finances
The club didn't lose any cash from the free tickets... the foundation covered the costs. this was part of the HDM "bounce back " campaign.
clubfoot fc wrote:The club didn't lose any cash from the free tickets... the foundation covered the costs. this was part of the HDM "bounce back " campaign.
clubfoot fc wrote:The club didn't lose any cash from the free tickets... the foundation covered the costs. this was part of the HDM "bounce back " campaign.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
.
