Hutchie wrote:Only way Fox will play in the 4 nations is if he finds a French grandparent

nick hkr wrote:Problem is those that came before him would come way behind him in the weights room FACT, they would probably come way behind him in the stamina testing, and not to mention defensive ability.

Foxy is by far not a finished product but he's a lot further ahead of anyone you've mentioned. And before you mention Raynor, I like my wingers to run forward and think he's more at stake of losing his international place to a youngster than Foxy is.

fcimp wrote:So if there is no way through forward you would prefer your wingers to die with the ball rather than looking for the offload or a gap like Raynor does?

fcimp wrote:Fox only got in cos T Briscoe was injured. The fact Briscoe was named in the original training squad and Fox was a late addition says it all.

MrPhilb wrote:Yes, because as the evidence shows that doesn't fooking work

nick hkr wrote:I am not saying it is not an option but he runs 40yrds sideways 2yrds forwards and gets tackled, hardly ever finds a gap to run through and in your lazy squad doesnt get the runners to pass onto so IF he does pass you more often than not lose ground. And before you tell me I'm wrong I watch more Hull games than you'd imagine!

Bobbin' Along wrote:Did you see Castleford's failure to deal with a Leeds bomb resulting in a beautiful length of the pitch try for Shenton?
Would you use this example to advocate players taking their eye off the ball?

fcimp wrote:What point are you trying to make? Raynor deliberately ran accross the pitch to create an overlap, which he did rather well!!