J.I.M wrote:I would expect whino feckwitts to pick low intensity walk in the parks like cas at home as obvious choices.
Having spoken to people at the club they were always scaling back during the season.
The majority of the squad came back from the world cup physically and mentally shattered.
There was little or no pre-season before the players had to attempt to peak for a WCC and, shortly thereafter an earl;y cup tie against Saints.
The training and game plan have been deliberately scaled down all season long.
If you listened to Mclennan's post match interviews after the cas game he said they had targeted that game, after the break, for quite some time as the point to scale up the training, scale up the preparation and scale up the performance.
If you watched us in the game we played a very different brand of rugby to that we have played all year. It was very good.
So, with that in mind it is not an unreasonable proposition to state that the Case game was our best performance because it was pivotal and they had geared up for it. Not only that but they executed the game plan to perfection.
I don't give a love about the opposition and their lack of intensity. I was more concerned with how we looked in the run in to the playoffs and our performance and discipline were spot on.
So, my enlightened friend, that is why I consider it our best performance of the year. Now, am I a fekkwitt or can you offer me a more reasoned and justified rebuttal?