Serious question.
Who is the highlighted part attributed to, Craig Hall or Agar?

Many games Craig Hall dropped the proverbial which cost the team. We all knew his talent but he was raw to say the least. Remember the KC derby this year?

If you are blaming Agar then that is your beef. Peter Sharp once blamed Hall for losing a game in London by missing all his kicks. End of the day he did!

Responsibility.

Craig Hall has gone away and worked on his game, a loan spell at Widnes and recent form would suggest he is getting stronger. Not the finished article but a hell of a talent.

I've not got a beef with either,
it's just that a lot of your fans blamed Agar, and some blamed Hall, but having seen Craig on TV I could see how his confidence had completely gone, and the fans were on his back, but there were people screeming he should be brought back and Agar shown the door,
The sentence "sometimes you need to take responsibility for your actions because it is scrutonised by everyone" could have been attributed to either,
Like I said it was a serious question, and not a snipe at either.

I hope I answered your query. Both still have a lot to prove.

Agar was at fault for playing him out of position but in the backs we had Tony, Byrne, Briscoe and Raynor out and R Horne and Thorman started the season OK in the halves. That said, Hall was a disaster at FB, so awful that I thought we should get rid. His handling, defence and decision-making were terrible. He's only really got back in as Yeaman and Briscoe have both been injured, but has looked a different player since his loan spell. He still has brain explosions, but his knack for finding the try-line is uncanny. You've got a good 'un there and I'll be very disappointed to see him pull on the red and white shirt next season. Assuming the OP is in full possession of all the FACTS, of course.

Don't know where he will end up, but wish him well whatever he decides is right for him, on your other point, I thought Briscoe was a winger, so I really couldn't understand why Agar played Hall out off position, then had the temerity to blame Hall, and some of his recent comments regarding the FC players seemed rather strange, considering he's the coach.

Which comments did you find strange out of interest?

I find these posts very strange, considering there are rules in place about talking to players under contract, (well for 4 more days) how can he have already signed a contract while he's under contract with Hull:roll: if you had posted this in September, it may have had some creedence.

Hall is under contract at FC until end 2010.

They need to go back to basics.(Thats his job)
It leaves me questioning where rugby sits on the list of priorities of some of our players (He's incharge of club discipline).
The fans are having a detrimental effect on our performance.(It's up to him to change that and the fans have a right to voice there frustration).