According to Sporting Life, Finnegan has been told he has no case to answer, and quite rightly so - shouldnt have even been a penalty.

I always thought that putting a player on report was an action taken by the ref when he couldn't tell if an offence had been committed. So if he was unsure and placed Simon on report, how did he know to give a penalty against him?

I believe this also happened to one of our players in the Bulls game. Have the refs adapted the rules to suit themselves or is this normal?

Never in doubt, in my book.