Jonh, please don't rate yourself so highly, that is your problem, no one is getting worked up over anything you say, infact it's the exact opposite, hence why I reassured Jack that you are a pr@tt who likes to argue, thats all you are in all honesty.
Once again you've got it wrong, I have totally no issue with someone disagreeing with me, everyone is entitled to an opinion, it would be a boring forum without discussion! But it's your manner and the way you suddenly become condersending with your attitude to people on he who disagree with your points, I read some of your replies to Jack, same condersending belittling replies you always try to us when someone disgrees.
Relax Jonh and realise, this is only a discussion board.
jonh wrote:Mossop is a secondrow who will become a Prop. Coley can cover second row if needed.
In your opinion Bailey should be gone next year fair enough and prior to Hock's ban i agreed with you, but again you cannot expect to win the forwards battle with an inexperienced lightweight backrow, given we have such a lightweight frontrow.
As usual I find myself going round in circles whenever you 2 get your heads together, and to be honest i have not the time for it, so feel free to crack on, until I see something that takes the debate forward there is no point in continuing with posting on this topic.
No one at the Wigan club has said anything about Mossop moving to prop.
jonh wrote:Mossop is a secondrow who will become a Prop. Coley can cover second row if needed.
In your opinion Bailey should be gone next year fair enough and prior to Hock's ban i agreed with you, but again you cannot expect to win the forwards battle with an inexperienced lightweight backrow, given we have such a lightweight frontrow.
As usual I find myself going round in circles whenever you 2 get your heads together, and to be honest i have not the time for it, so feel free to crack on, until I see something that takes the debate forward there is no point in continuing with posting on this topic.
Nice of you to even give us the time you have given us so far.
However, in future, please feel free to ignore my posts altogether.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20488 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Last Son of Wigan wrote:Jonh, please don't rate yourself so highly, that is your problem, no one is getting worked up over anything you say, infact it's the exact opposite, hence why I reassured Jack that you are a pr@tt who likes to argue, thats all you are in all honesty.
Once again you've got it wrong, I have totally no issue with someone disagreeing with me, everyone is entitled to an opinion, it would be a boring forum without discussion! But it's your manner and the way you suddenly become condersending with your attitude to people on he who disagree with your points, I read some of your replies to Jack, same condersending belittling replies you always try to us when someone disgrees.
Relax Jonh and realise, this is only a discussion board.
I think you are confusing condecsending with opinion backed up by why i hold this opinion, nothing more nothing less.
To accused of calling people names and then twice in the same thread to be called a pratt by the same posted making the accusation does make me wonder about you.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
jonh wrote:I think you are confusing condecsending with opinion backed up by why i hold this opinion, nothing more nothing less.
To accused of calling people names and then twice in the same thread to be called a pratt by the same posted making the accusation does make me wonder about you.
I called you a pratt because of the names and manner you attack people. If you didn't then I wouldn't. Simple really.
At times Jonh you post some solid posts which make sense, your issue seems to be when people disagree with you. What a meal you made of my opinon of wanting to sign Long on a 2yr deal, that was my opinion. P.S I think we would have beaten Wire if Long with at 7 to Sam at 6 in the semi, another one of my opinions.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20488 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Last Son of Wigan wrote:In nearly ever post you mention how Mossop will be a prop in the future. I thought you backed up your opinion with facts?
It is my opinion he will end up as a Prop, time will tell. If you could back an opinion up with 100% facts, it would cease to be an opinion and become a fact.
I say this as i think he is ultimately his build and style is better suited to Prop, also given he has significant game time at Reserve level as a Prop it would indicate that it is a distinct possibility.
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
Joined: May 27 2003 Posts: 20488 Location: educating League Freak on all things rugby league
Last Son of Wigan wrote:I called you a pratt because of the names and manner you attack people. If you didn't then I wouldn't. Simple really.
At times Jonh you post some solid posts which make sense, your issue seems to be when people disagree with you. What a meal you made of my opinon of wanting to sign Long on a 2yr deal, that was my opinion. P.S I think we would have beaten Wire if Long with at 7 to Sam at 6 in the semi, another one of my opinions.
Where have i attacked anyone?
You accuse me of calling people names again where?
Unofficially the most boring poster on Cherry and White.
jonh wrote:It is my opinion he will end up as a Prop, time will tell. If you could back an opinion up with 100% facts, it would cease to be an opinion and become a fact.
I say this as i think he is ultimately his build and style is better suited to Prop, also given he has significant game time at Reserve level as a Prop it would indicate that it is a distinct possibility.
You clearly wrote how Mossop 'will be a prop' that statement is not a matter of option but a factual comment.
An option doesn't become a fact if backed up by facts Jonh, for example, someone may say Tomkins is a better SR than Bailey then back up their comment with stats facts, then someone will counter that comment with other stat facts to prove Bailey is a better SR, hence a debate.
Follow?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
