Yeamo wrote:we should have been 18-0 up after half an hour

j_hunter_hkr wrote:Hudds first is forward as is the one in the lead up to their second, in my opinion. Hall's to Berrigan isn't helped by the fact that Berrigan is stood infront of Hall for most of that play, but in all honesty the pass doesn't look forward from that angle.

Big Dave T wrote:Sounds a close game by whats been said on here, oh hang on a minute.....

knocker norton wrote:We clearly could and should have been in the lead by a couple of scrores.

Previous Hull teams had an attitude of never knowing when they were beaten. Massive contrast to the current crop eh?

Mr. Zucchini Head wrote:Looked to be nothing wrong with Berrigan and Tansey's disallowed tries as far as I can see.

Rupert Pupkin wrote:Great coverage by the way but what about Thorman

DannyB wrote:People felt "sorry" for him I don't know no excuse, he's a professional rugby player and he flaps like a chicken trying to catch a ball.