Tommy will spend more time at 9 next year than 7. That is his best position

The answer is not a one year contract for ANYONE!

Hang about! Who's "everybody"????

I over heard a conversation Friday that Phil Veivers is going back to Aus at the end of the season is this true??

Stacy Jones would be a mistake.

IF were bringing a SH in it needs to be a player whos going to be about for 4-5 years not 12 months. we need a settled 6/7.

My fears about sam needing an experienced head beside him have gone. plus i'm liking the sam/tommy partnership i dont actually believe a SH is needed as much as we first feared.

we keep sam and tommy or We start from next year with building a partnership not keep swapping and changing every 12 months.

Would his son be going back with him then?

I have no idea if it is true, but the two lads talking at the game Friday said all the Family where going back???

No, he won't

correct.

McIllorum and Riddell have both played well and are good enough hookers.

Tommy has become a lot more creative since Tomkins consistently lined up with him, let's see how that progresses for another year with a bit more strength in the front row.

I'd be happy to just start the season with one new aussie prop, releasing Bailey and Smith [who else is leaving?]. Send a few of the kids out on loan such as Ainscough, Goulding/Pryce if Carmont stays, O'Carroll and probably Flanagan.

Heard he's primed for a move to Aus to play reserve grade (his GF has just gotten a job over there). Anyone else heard this?